The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Split Questionnaire Survey Design
Abstract
This article develops a survey design where the questionnaire is split into components and individuals are administered the varying subsets of the components. A multiple imputation method for analyzing data from this design is developed, in which the imputations are created by random draws from the posterior predictive distribution of the missing parts, given the observed parts by using Gibbs sampling under a general location scale model. Results from two simulation studies that investigate the properties of the inferences using this design are reported. In the first study several random split questionnaire designs are imposed on the complete data from an existing survey collected using a long questionnaire, and the corresponding data elements are extracted to form split data sets. Inferences obtained using the complete data and the split data are then compared. This comparison suggests that little is lost, at least in the example considered, by administering only parts of the questionnaire to each sampled individual. The second simulation study reports on the investigation of the efficiency of the split questionnaire design and the robustness of the estimates to the distributional assumptions used to create imputations. In this study several complete and split data sets were generated under a variety of distributional assumptions, and the imputations for the split data sets were created assuming the normality of the distributions. The sampling properties of the point and interval estimates of the regression coefficient in a particular logistic regression model using both the complete and split data sets were compared. This comparison suggests that the loss in efficiency of the split questionnaire design decreases as the correlation among the variables that are within different parts increases. The proposed multiple imputation method seems to be sensitive to the skewness and relatively insensitive to the kurtosis, contrary to the assumed normality of the distribution for the observables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Bayesian computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
Smith, A. F. M., & Roberts, G. O. (1993) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1993.tb01466.x · Cited by 1,713
Cited by
Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world
Graham, J. W. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530 · Cited by 6,163
Multiple imputation after 18+ years
Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476908 · Cited by 4,072
Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation
King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401000235 · Cited by 1,834
Little, T. D., Jorgensen, T. D., Lang, K. M., & Moore, E. W. G. (2014) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jst048 · Cited by 666
Planned missing data designs in psychological research.
Graham, J. W., Taylor, B. J., Olchowski, A. E., & Cumsille, P. E. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.4.323 · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Raghunathan, T. E., & Grizzle, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 429
- Pages
- 54-63
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1979370357
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Split Questionnaire Survey Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476488
- The paper
- Raghunathan, T. E., & Grizzle, J. E. (1995). A Split Questionnaire Survey Design. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476488
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.