Cited by 353Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPharmaceutical studies and practices

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using Population Modeling and Informative Prior Distributions

Gelman, Andrew, Bois, Frederic, Jiang, Jiming·1996·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

We describe a general approach using Bayesian analysis for the estimation of parameters in physiological pharmacokinetic models. The chief statistical difficulty in estimation with these models is that any physiological model that is even approximately realistic will have a large number of parameters, often comparable to the number of observations in a typical pharmacokinetic experiment (e.g., 28 measurements and 15 parameters for each subject). In addition, the parameters are generally poorly identified, akin to the well-known ill-conditioned problem of estimating a mixture of declining exponentials. Our modeling includes (a) hierarchical population modeling, which allows partial pooling of information among different experimental subjects; (b) a pharmacokinetic model including compartments for well-perfused tissues, poorly perfused tissues, fat, and the liver; and (c) informative prior distributions for population parameters, which is possible because the parameters represent real physiological variables. We discuss how to estimate the models using Bayesian posterior simulation, a method that automatically includes the uncertainty inherent in estimating such a large number of parameters. We also discuss how to check model fit and sensitivity to the prior distribution using posterior predictive simulation. We illustrate the application to the toxicokinetics of tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene [PERC]), the problem that motivated this work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476708

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structuring parameters into batches is useful in many different sorts of models, including nonlinear differential equations in toxicology and Boolean latent-data models in psychometrics.

    “We have found the method of structuring parameters into batches to be useful in many different sorts of models, including nonlinear differential equations in toxicology, where population variability can be expressed in terms of a distribution of person-level parameters [e.g., Gelman, Bois and Jiang (1996)] and Boolean latent-data models in psychometrics, which have batches of parameters indexed by”

    From Analysis of variance—why it is more important than ever (2005) · cites this paper as Gelman, Bois and Jiang (1996)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gelman, A., Bois, F., & Jiang, J.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1996-12
Volume
91
Issue
436
Pages
1400-1412
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2046443205
Cited by
353
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, population pharmacokinetics, informative priors, Bayesian parameter estimation, partial pooling, toxicokinetics, tetrachloroethylene, posterior predictive simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review