Physiological Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using Population Modeling and Informative Prior Distributions
Abstract
We describe a general approach using Bayesian analysis for the estimation of parameters in physiological pharmacokinetic models. The chief statistical difficulty in estimation with these models is that any physiological model that is even approximately realistic will have a large number of parameters, often comparable to the number of observations in a typical pharmacokinetic experiment (e.g., 28 measurements and 15 parameters for each subject). In addition, the parameters are generally poorly identified, akin to the well-known ill-conditioned problem of estimating a mixture of declining exponentials. Our modeling includes (a) hierarchical population modeling, which allows partial pooling of information among different experimental subjects; (b) a pharmacokinetic model including compartments for well-perfused tissues, poorly perfused tissues, fat, and the liver; and (c) informative prior distributions for population parameters, which is possible because the parameters represent real physiological variables. We discuss how to estimate the models using Bayesian posterior simulation, a method that automatically includes the uncertainty inherent in estimating such a large number of parameters. We also discuss how to check model fit and sensitivity to the prior distribution using posterior predictive simulation. We illustrate the application to the toxicokinetics of tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene [PERC]), the problem that motivated this work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Structuring parameters into batches is useful in many different sorts of models, including nonlinear differential equations in toxicology and Boolean latent-data models in psychometrics.
“We have found the method of structuring parameters into batches to be useful in many different sorts of models, including nonlinear differential equations in toxicology, where population variability can be expressed in terms of a distribution of person-level parameters [e.g., Gelman, Bois and Jiang (1996)] and Boolean latent-data models in psychometrics, which have batches of parameters indexed by”
From Analysis of variance—why it is more important than ever (2005) · cites this paper as Gelman, Bois and Jiang (1996)
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013) · doi:10.1201/b16018 · Cited by 27,276 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787 · Cited by 6,045 · see citing works
Self-citationParameter estimation for differential equations: a generalized smoothing approach
Ramsay, J. O., Hooker, G., Campbell, D., & Cao, J. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00610.x · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Improving transparency and replication in Bayesian statistics: The WAMBS-Checklist.
Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (2017) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000065 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Drug Development
Sheiner, L. B., & Steimer, J.-L. (2000) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.67 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Probabilistic projections of the total fertility rate for all countries
Alkema, L., Raftery, A. E., Gerland, P., Clark, S. J., Pelletier, F., Buettner, T., & Heilig, G. K. (2011) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-011-0040-5 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Parameter uncertainty in biochemical models described by ordinary differential equations
Vanlier, J., Tiemann, C. A., Hilbers, P. A. J., & van Riel, N. A. W. (2013) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2013.03.006 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Chou, W.-C., & Lin, Z. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.058 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Analysis of variance—why it is more important than ever
Gelman, A. (2005) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053604000001048 · Cited by 861 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gelman, A., Bois, F., & Jiang, J.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 436
- Pages
- 1400-1412
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2046443205
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Keywords
- physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, population pharmacokinetics, informative priors, Bayesian parameter estimation, partial pooling, toxicokinetics, tetrachloroethylene, posterior predictive simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review