The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Test of Significance Based on Wavelet Thresholding and Neyman's Truncation
Abstract
Traditional nonparametric tests, such as the Kolmogorov—Smirnov test and the Cramér—Von Mises test, are based on the empirical distribution functions. Although these tests possess root-n consistency, they effectively use only information contained in the low frequencies. This leads to low power in detecting fine features such as sharp and short aberrants as well as global features such as high-frequency alternations. The drawback can be repaired via smoothing-based test statistics. In this article we propose two such kind of test statistics based on the wavelet thresholding and the Neyman truncation. We provide extensive evidence to demonstrate that the proposed tests have higher power in detecting sharp peaks and high frequency alternations, while maintaining the same capability in detecting smooth alternative densities as the traditional tests. Similar conclusions can be made for two-sample nonparametric tests of distribution functions. In that case, the traditional linear rank tests such as the Wilcoxon test and the Fisher—Yates test have low power in detecting two nearby densities where one has local features or contains high-frequency components, because these procedures are essentially testing the uniform distribution based on the sample mean of rank statistics. In contrast, the proposed tests use more fully the sampling information and have better ability in detecting subtle features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
SHAPIRO, S. S., & WILK, M. B. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 · Cited by 23,480
An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples)
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2333709 · Cited by 23,469
A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation
Mallat, S. G. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.192463 · Cited by 21,372
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,796
Daubechies, I., & Heil, C. (1992) · Computers in Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4823127 · Cited by 15,631
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage
Donoho, D. L., & Johnstone, I. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.425 · Cited by 8,760
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
(1986) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9 · Cited by 8,525
Nonparametric Statistical Methods
(1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485954 · Cited by 6,090
Cited by
Power Enhancement in High-Dimensional Cross-Sectional Tests
Fan, J., Liao, Y., & Yao, J. (2015) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta12749 · Cited by 450
Self-citationPolynomial splines and their tensor products in extended linear modeling: 1994 Wald memorial lecture
Stone, C. J., Hansen, M. H., Kooperberg, C., & Truong, Y. K. (1997) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1031594728 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 434
- Pages
- 674-688
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2094660994
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Test of Significance Based on Wavelet Thresholding and Neyman's Truncation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476936
- The paper
- Fan, J. (1996). Test of Significance Based on Wavelet Thresholding and Neyman's Truncation. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476936
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.