The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power Enhancement in High-Dimensional Cross-Sectional Tests
Open accessAbstract
= 0 against sparse alternatives where the null hypothesis is violated only by a couple of components. Existing tests based on quadratic forms such as the Wald statistic often suffer from low powers due to the accumulation of errors in estimating high-dimensional parameters. More powerful tests for sparse alternatives such as thresholding and extreme-value tests, on the other hand, require either stringent conditions or bootstrap to derive the null distribution and often suffer from size distortions due to the slow convergence. Based on a screening technique, we introduce a "power enhancement component", which is zero under the null hypothesis with high probability, but diverges quickly under sparse alternatives. The proposed test statistic combines the power enhancement component with an asymptotically pivotal statistic, and strengthens the power under sparse alternatives. The null distribution does not require stringent regularity conditions, and is completely determined by that of the pivotal statistic. As specific applications, the proposed methods are applied to testing the factor pricing models and validating the cross-sectional independence in panel data models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Carhart, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x · Cited by 17,283
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns
FAMA, E. F., & FRENCH, K. R. (1992) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x · Cited by 17,261
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Baltagi, B. H. (2021) · Springer Texts in Business and Economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5 · Cited by 15,104
The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297111 · Cited by 8,982
Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
Fan, J., & Li, R. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273 · Cited by 8,900
Self-citationThe arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing
Ross, S. A. (1976) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(76)90046-6 · Cited by 7,009
Forecasting Using Principal Components From a Large Number of Predictors
Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2002) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214502388618960 · Cited by 2,985
A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence
Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1368-423x.2007.00227.x · Cited by 2,531
A Test of the Efficiency of a Given Portfolio
Gibbons, M. R., Ross, S. A., & Shanken, J. (1989) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913625 · Cited by 2,350
A Test for Superior Predictive Ability
Hansen, P. R. (2005) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/073500105000000063 · Cited by 1,230
Cited by
Characteristics are covariances: A unified model of risk and return
Kelly, B. T., Pruitt, S., & Su, Y. (2019) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.05.001 · Cited by 809
Asset Pricing with Omitted Factors
Giglio, S., & Xiu, D. (2021) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/714090 · Cited by 355
Factor Models, Machine Learning, and Asset Pricing
Giglio, S., Kelly, B., & Xiu, D. (2022) · Annual Review of Financial Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-financial-101521-104735 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, J., Liao, Y., & Yao, J.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1497-1541
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123735241
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power Enhancement in High-Dimensional Cross-Sectional Tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3982/ecta12749
- The paper
- Fan, J., Liao, Y., & Yao, J. (2015). Power Enhancement in High-Dimensional Cross-Sectional Tests. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta12749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.