The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marginal Regression Models for Clustered Ordinal Measurements
Abstract
This article constructs statistical models for clustered ordinal measurements. We specify two regression models: one for the marginal means and one for the marginal pairwise global odds ratios. Of particular interest are problems in which the odds ratio regression is a focus. Simple assumptions about higher-order conditional moments give a quadratic exponential likelihood function with second-order estimating equations (GEE2) as score equations. But computational difficulty can arise for large clusters when both the mean response and the association between measures is of interest. First, we present GEE1 as an alternative estimation strategy. Second, we extend to repeated ordinal measurements the method developed by Carey et al. for binary observations that is based on alternating logistic regressions (ALR) for the marginal mean parameters and the pairwise log-odds ratio parameters. We study the efficiency of GEE1 and ALR relative to full maximum likelihood. We demonstrate the utility of our regression methods for ordinal data by applying the methods to a surgical follow-up study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Cited by
The R Package geepack for Generalized Estimating Equations
Halekoh, U., Højsgaard, S., & Yan, J. (2006) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v015.i02 · Cited by 1,907
Greendale, G. (1998) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00305-6 · Cited by 317
The analysis of ordered categorical data: An overview and a survey of recent developments
Liu, I., & Agresti, A. (2005) · Test · doi:10.1007/bf02595397 · Cited by 301
Heagerty, P. J., & Zeger, S. L. (2000) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212671 · Cited by 298
Self-citationA Composite Likelihood Approach to Binary Spatial Data
Heagerty, P. J., & Lele, S. R. (1998) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1998.10473771 · Cited by 274
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heagerty, P. J., & Zeger, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 435
- Pages
- 1024-1036
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2042049930
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marginal Regression Models for Clustered Ordinal Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476973
- The paper
- Heagerty, P. J., & Zeger, S. L. (1996). Marginal Regression Models for Clustered Ordinal Measurements. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.