The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maximum Likelihood Estimation in the Proportional Odds Model
Abstract
We consider maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters in the proportional odds model with right-censored data. The estimator of the regression coefficient is shown to be asymptotically normal with efficient variance. The maximum likelihood estimator of the unknown monotonic transformation of the survival time converges uniformly at a parametric rate to the true transformation. Estimates for the standard errors of the estimated regression coefficients are obtained by differentiation of the profile likelihood and are shown to be consistent. A likelihood ratio test for the regression coefficient is also considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rudin, W. (1973) · Cited by 13,740
Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes
van der Vaart, A. W., & Wellner, J. A. (1996) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2545-2 · Cited by 5,014
Self-citationA Course in Probability Theory
(1974) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-22097-6 · Cited by 2,668
Multivariate Generalizations of the Proportional Hazards Model
Clayton, D., & Cuzick, J. (1985) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2981943 · Cited by 625
Analysis of survival data by the proportional odds model
Bennett, S. (1983) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780020223 · Cited by 465
Analysis of transformation models with censored data
CHENG, S. C., WEI, L. J., & YING, Z. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.835 · Cited by 453
Log-Logistic Regression Models for Survival Data
Bennett, S. (1983) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2347295 · Cited by 342
Consistency in a Proportional Hazards Model Incorporating a Random Effect
Murphy, S. A. (1994) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176325492 · Cited by 222
Self-citationA Semiparametric Proportional Odds Regression Model for the Analysis of Current Status Data
Rossini, A. J., & Tsiatis, A. A. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476939 · Cited by 187
Self-citationEstimation and Testing in a Two-Sample Generalized Odds-Rate Model
Dabrowska, D. M., & Doksum, K. A. (1988) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478657 · Cited by 180
Cited by
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290
Murphy, S. A., & Van Der Vaart, A. W. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10474219 · Cited by 712
Self-citationFrailty Models in Survival Analysis
Wienke, A. (2010) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420073911 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, S. A., Rossini, A. J., & van der Vaart, A. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 439
- Pages
- 968-976
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2016681503
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximum Likelihood Estimation in the Proportional Odds Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1997.10474051
- The paper
- Murphy, S. A., Rossini, A. J., & van der Vaart, A. W. (1997). Maximum Likelihood Estimation in the Proportional Odds Model. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1997.10474051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.