The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Test of Significance When Data are Curves
Open accessAbstract
With modern technology, massive data can easily be collected in a form of multiple sets of curves. New statistical challenge includes testing whether there is any statistically significant difference among these sets of curves. In this article we propose some new tests for comparing two groups of curves based on the adaptive Neyman test and the wavelet thresholding techniques introduced earlier by Fan. We demonstrate that these tests inherit the properties outlined by Fan and that they are simple and powerful for detecting differences between two sets of curves. We then further generalize the idea to compare multiple sets of curves, resulting in an adaptive high-dimensional analysis of variance, called HANOVA. These newly developed techniques are illustrated by using a dataset on pizza commercials where observations are curves and an analysis of cornea topography in ophthalmology where images of individuals are observed. A simulation example is also presented to illustrate the power of the adaptive Neyman test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Multisite Study of the Clinical Diagnosis of Different Autism Spectrum Disorders
Lord, C. (2012) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.148 · Cited by 516
“Sites significantly deviating from the rest with respect to mean values were identified based on tolerance bands under the assumption of no differences between sites using permutation tests.(29,30) Categorical measures were described through ranges of proportions across sites; differences between sites were assessed w…”
MethodAn anova test for functional data
Cuevas, A., Febrero, M., & Fraiman, R. (2004) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2003.10.021 · Cited by 493
Wavelet-based Functional Mixed Models
Morris, J. S., & Carroll, R. J. (2006) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00539.x · Cited by 396
Comparability of Segmented Line Regression Models
Kim, H., Fay, M. P., Yu, B., Barrett, M. J., & Feuer, E. J. (2004) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2004.00256.x · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, J., & Lin, S.-K.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 443
- Pages
- 1007-1021
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W1550667960
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Test of Significance When Data are Curves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1998.10473763
- The paper
- Fan, J., & Lin, S.-K. (1998). Test of Significance When Data are Curves. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1998.10473763
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.