The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wavelet-based Functional Mixed Models
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Increasingly, scientific studies yield functional data, in which the ideal units of observation are curves and the observed data consist of sets of curves that are sampled on a fine grid. We present new methodology that generalizes the linear mixed model to the functional mixed model framework, with model fitting done by using a Bayesian wavelet-based approach. This method is flexible, allowing functions of arbitrary form and the full range of fixed effects structures and between-curve covariance structures that are available in the mixed model framework. It yields nonparametric estimates of the fixed and random-effects functions as well as the various between-curve and within-curve covariance matrices. The functional fixed effects are adaptively regularized as a result of the non-linear shrinkage prior that is imposed on the fixed effects’ wavelet coefficients, and the random-effect functions experience a form of adaptive regularization because of the separately estimated variance components for each wavelet coefficient. Because we have posterior samples for all model quantities, we can perform pointwise or joint Bayesian inference or prediction on the quantities of the model. The adaptiveness of the method makes it especially appropriate for modelling irregular functional data that are characterized by numerous local features like peaks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation
Mallat, S. G. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.192463 · Cited by 21,372
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Daubechies, I., & Heil, C. (1992) · Computers in Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4823127 · Cited by 15,631
Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529876 · Cited by 8,923
Adapting to Unknown Smoothness via Wavelet Shrinkage
Donoho, D. L., & Johnstone, I. M. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476626 · Cited by 4,630
Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data
Verbeke, G. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2294-1_3 · Cited by 3,506
Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn
Brix, A. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2004.00347_4.x · Cited by 1,767
Marron, J. S., Ramsey, J. O., & Silverman, B. W. (1998) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669864 · Cited by 1,403
Matrix Algebra From a Statistician’s Perspective
Harville, D. A. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b98818 · Cited by 1,159
Cited by
Riemann manifold langevin and hamiltonian monte carlo methods
Girolami, M., & Calderhead, B. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00765.x · Cited by 1,473
Xiao, L., Huang, L., Schrack, J. A., Ferrucci, L., Zipunnikov, V., & Crainiceanu, C. M. (2015) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxu045 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, J. S., & Carroll, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-03-03
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-199
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2106575405
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 12.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wavelet-based Functional Mixed Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00539.x
- The paper
- Morris, J. S., & Carroll, R. J. (2006). Wavelet-based Functional Mixed Models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00539.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.