Cited by 121Sports Analytics and PerformanceStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceSports Performance and Training

A State-Space Model for National Football League Scores

Glickman, Mark E., Stern, Hal S.·1998·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

This article develops a predictive model for National Football League (NFL) game scores using data from the period 1988–1993. The parameters of primary interest—measures of team strength—are expected to vary over time. Our model accounts for this source of variability by modeling football outcomes using a state-space model that assumes team strength parameters follow a first-order autoregressive process. Two sources of variation in team strengths are addressed in our model; week-to-week changes in team strength due to injuries and other random factors, and season-to-season changes resulting from changes in personnel and other longer-term factors. Our model also incorporates a home-field advantage while allowing for the possibility that the magnitude of the advantage may vary across teams. The aim of the analysis is to obtain plausible inferences concerning team strengths and other model parameters, and to predict future game outcomes. Iterative simulation is used to obtain samples from the joint posterior distribution of all model parameters. Our model appears to outperform the Las Vegas “betting line” on a small test set consisting of the last 110 games of the 1993 NFL season.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1998.10474084

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glickman and Stern (1998) propose a Bayesian state-space model for paired comparisons for predicting NFL games, allowing team strength parameters to vary over time.

    “Glickman and Stern (1998) propose a Bayesian state-space model for paired comparisons for predicting NFL games, allowing team strength parameters to vary over time.”

    From Big ideas in sports analytics and statistical tools for their investigation (2023) · cites this paper as Glickman and Stern (1998)

  • Both Glickman and Stern (1998) and Lopez et al. (2018) motivate the usefulness of model-based measures of team strength by demonstrating their superiority to low-resolution win-loss records.

    “Both papers motivate the usefulness of model-based measures of team strength by demonstrating their superiority to low-resolution win-loss records.”

    From Big ideas in sports analytics and statistical tools for their investigation (2023) · cites this paper as Glickman and Stern (1998)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glickman, M. E., & Stern, H. S.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1998-03
Volume
93
Issue
441
Pages
25-35
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2034651680
Cited by
121
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
National Football League, state-space model, team strength, time-varying parameters, first-order autoregressive process, home advantage, sports performance modeling, iterative simulation, posterior distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review