The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Asymptotic Distribution of P Values in Composite Null Models
Abstract
We investigate the compatibility of a null model H 0 with the data by calculating a p value; that is, the probability, under H 0, that a given test statistic T exceeds its observed value. When the null model consists of a single distribution, the p value is readily obtained, and it has a uniform distribution under H 0. On the other hand, when the null model depends on an unknown nuisance parameter θ one must somehow get rid of θ, (e.g., by estimating it) to calculate a p value. Various proposals have been suggested to “remove” θ, each yielding a different candidate p value. But unlike the simple case, these p values typically are not uniformly distributed under the null model. In this article we investigate their asymptotic distribution under H 0. We show that when the asymptotic mean of the test statistic T depends on θ, the posterior predictive p value of Guttman and Rubin, and the plug-in p value are conservative (i.e., their asymptotic distributions are more concentrated around 1/2 than a uniform), with the posterior predictive p value being the more conservative. In contrast, the partial posterior predictive and conditional predictive p values of Bayarri and Berger are asymptotically uniform. Furthermore, we show that the discrepancy p value of Meng and Gelman and colleagues can be conservative, even when the discrepancy measure has mean 0 under the null model. We also describe ways to modify the conservative p values to make their distributions asymptotically uniform.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Bootstrap Methods and their Application
Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802843 · Cited by 7,350
Vaart, A. W. V. D. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802256 · Cited by 4,159
Self-citation
Cited by
Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics
Gelman, A., & Shalizi, C. R. (2013) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x · Cited by 825
(2013) · Bayesian Data Analysis · doi:10.1201/b16018-21 · Cited by 631
Combining Field Data and Computer Simulations for Calibration and Prediction
Higdon, D., Kennedy, M., Cavendish, J. C., Cafeo, J. A., & Ryne, R. D. (2004) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827503426693 · Cited by 623
The interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysis
Bayarri, M. J., & Berger, J. O. (2004) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/088342304000000116 · Cited by 525
Amrhein, V., Trafimow, D., & Greenland, S. (2019) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2018.1543137 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Robins, J. M., van der Vaart, A., & Ventura, V.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 452
- Pages
- 1143-1156
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2077428996
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asymptotic Distribution of P Values in Composite Null Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.2000.10474310
- The paper
- Robins, J. M., van der Vaart, A., & Ventura, V. (2000). Asymptotic Distribution of P Values in Composite Null Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2000.10474310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.