The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining Field Data and Computer Simulations for Calibration and Prediction
Abstract
We develop a statistical approach for characterizing uncertainty in predictions that are made with the aid of a computer simulation model. Typically, the computer simulation code models a physical system and requires a set of inputs---some known and specified, others unknown. A limited amount of field data from the true physical system is available to inform us about the unknown inputs and also to inform us about the uncertainty that is associated with a simulation-based prediction. The approach given here allows for the following:uncertainty regarding model inputs (i.e., calibration); accounting for uncertainty due to limitations on the number of simulations that can be carried out; discrepancy between the simulation code and the actual physical system; uncertainty in the observation process that yields the actual field data on the true physical system. The resulting analysis yields predictions and their associated uncertainties while accounting for multiple sources of uncertainty. We use a Bayesian formulation and rely on Gaussian process models to model unknown functions of the model inputs. The estimation is carried out using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. This methodology is applied to two examples: a charged particle accelerator and a spot welding process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice
(1995) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14835 · Cited by 7,757
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271432 · Cited by 7,415
Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments
Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J., & Wynn, H. P. (1989) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177012413 · Cited by 6,919
Monte Carlo Statistical Methods
Kim, H. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10485722 · Cited by 5,508
Bayesian calibration of computer models
Kennedy, M. C., & O'Hagan, A. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00294 · Cited by 4,222
Self-citationStein, M. L. (1999) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1494-6 · Cited by 2,348
Methods of multivariate analysis
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1586 · Cited by 2,281
Monte Carlo Statistical Methods
Robert, C. P., & Casella, G. (1999) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3071-5 · Cited by 2,278
Methods of Multivariate Analysis
Rencher, A. C. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471271357 · Cited by 2,040
Cited by
Yondo, R., Andrés, E., & Valero, E. (2018) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.11.003 · Cited by 311
Perspectives on the integration between first-principles and data-driven modeling
Bradley, W., Kim, J., Kilwein, Z., Blakely, L., Eydenberg, M., Jalvin, J., Laird, C., & Boukouvala, F. (2022) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107898 · Cited by 231
Probabilistic inference for future climate using an ensemble of climate model evaluations.
Rougier, J. (2007) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9156-9 · Cited by 218
“…simplest framework that takes explicit account of the model’s imperfections; this is also the de facto standard in the statistical treatment of model-based inference for complex systems (see, e.g., Craig et al., 2001; Kennedy and O’Hagan, 2001; Higdon et al., 2005; Goldstein and Rougier, 2006a).”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Higdon, D., Kennedy, M., Cavendish, J. C., Cafeo, J. A., & Ryne, R. D.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 448-466
- ISSN
- 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2092612581
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining Field Data and Computer Simulations for Calibration and Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/s1064827503426693
- The paper
- Higdon, D., Kennedy, M., Cavendish, J. C., Cafeo, J. A., & Ryne, R. D. (2004). Combining Field Data and Computer Simulations for Calibration and Prediction. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/s1064827503426693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.