The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stable Weights that Balance Covariates for Estimation With Incomplete Outcome Data
Abstract
Weighting methods that adjust for observed covariates, such as inverse probability weighting, are widely used for causal inference and estimation with incomplete outcome data. Part of the appeal of such methods is that one set of weights can be used to estimate a range of treatment effects based on different outcomes, or a variety of population means for several variables. However, this appeal can be diminished in practice by the instability of the estimated weights and by the difficulty of adequately adjusting for observed covariates in some settings. To address these limitations, this article presents a new weighting method that finds the weights of minimum variance that adjust or balance the empirical distribution of the observed covariates up to levels prespecified by the researcher. This method allows the researcher to balance very precisely the means of the observed covariates and other features of their marginal and joint distributions, such as variances and correlations and also, for example, the quantiles of interactions of pairs and triples of observed covariates, thus, balancing entire two- and three-way marginals. Since the weighting method is based on a well-defined convex optimization problem, duality theory provides insight into the behavior of the variance of the optimal weights in relation to the level of covariate balance adjustment, answering the question, how much does tightening a balance constraint increases the variance of the weights? Also, the weighting method runs in polynomial time so relatively large datasets can be handled quickly. An implementation of the method is provided in the new package sbw for R. This article shows some theoretical properties of the resulting weights and illustrates their use by analyzing both a dataset from the 2010 Chilean earthquake and a simulated example.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“modern statistical methods applied to large electronic health record databases to adjust for (“balance”) baseline differences in patients across types of treatment can be used to estimate aggregate treatment effects (131, 132).”
From Using Administrative Data to Predict Suicide After Psychiatric Hospitalization in the Veterans Health Administration System (2020) · cites this paper as [132]
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
(2002) · Cited by 13,211
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward
Stuart, E. A. (2010) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/09-sts313 · Cited by 5,478
A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446 · Cited by 4,293
Introduction to Nonparametric Estimation
Tsybakov, A. (2008) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b13794 · Cited by 3,687
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Elliott M.R., 2008, Journal of Official Statistics, 24, 517
- Rao J. N.K., 2009, Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 25, 371
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–365 of 365
Assessing Confounder Balance in Outcome Regressions
Popham, F., & Leyland, A. H. (2018) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000871
Minimax-inspired Semiparametric Estimation and Causal Inference
Hirshberg, D. A. (2018) · doi:10.7916/d86q3f30
“…in practical methodologies that emphasize balance when paired with AIPW methodology (Athey et al., 2016; Chan et al., 2015; Graham et al., 2012, 2016; Hainmueller, 2012; Hirano et al., 2001, 2003; Imai and Ratkovic, 2014; Kallus, 2016; Wang and Zubizarreta, 2017; Zhao, 2016; Zubizarreta, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialStochastic Doubly Robust GradientPreprint
Lee, K., Choi, J., Cha, M., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.08997
“…et al., 1994; Rotnitzky et al., 1998), first introduced in the area of observational study, has been known as an effective method to deal with such causal missingness and still remains popular (Bang & Robins, 2005; Kang et al., 2007; Rotnitzky et al., 2012; Han & Wang, 2013; Zubizarreta, 2015).”
MethodDiaz, I. M., & van der Laan, M. J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.01538
“Covariate balanced estimators have been traditionally used to reduce bias in observational studies and missing data models (e.g., Hainmueller, 2011; Imai and Ratkovic, 2014; Zubizarreta, 2015), but covariate selection for balancing remains an open problem.”
MethodBalance-Subsampled Stable PredictionPreprint
Kuang, K., Zhang, H., Wu, F. Q., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.04381
“The key idea is to construct sample weights by either employing propensity scores (Rosenbaum and Rubin, 1983, Kuang et al., 2017b, Austin, 2011) or optimizing weights directly (Athey et al., 2018, Zubizarreta, 2015, Hainmueller, 2012, Kuang et al., 2017a).”
MethodZhang, X., Wu, X., & Wang, Q. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.08741
“mization have been very popular recently (e.g., Chan et al., 2016; Hainmueller, 2012; Imai and Ratkovic, 2014; Li et al., 2018; Qin and Zhang, 2007; Wong and Chan, 2018; Yiu and Su, 2018; Zhao, 2019; Zubizarreta, 2015). Following the same idea, we seek functional propensity score estimates which can minimize the corre…”
MethodThe synthetic control approach: Multivalued treatments at the quantiles
Furno, M. (2020) · Research in Economics · doi:10.1016/j.rie.2020.10.009
Weighting-Based Treatment Effect Estimation via Distribution LearningPreprint
Zhang, D., & Zhang, K. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.13805
Inference on Heterogeneous Quantile Treatment Effects via Rank-Score BalancingPreprint
Giessing, A., & Wang, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Rubinstein, M., & Haviland, A. M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Survey data integration for regression analysis using model calibrationPreprint
Kim, H. J., Wang, Z., & Kim, J. K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
On matching-adjusted indirect comparison and calibration estimationPreprint
Wang, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.11687
“Zubizarreta [22] proposed stable balancing weights by forcing wi ≥ 0 but relaxing the constraints in (13) to | ∑n i=1 wiXi − X̄0| < d to allow for slight imbalance, controlled by a vector d to make the weights more stable.”
BackgroundWhy weight? Weighting approaches for causal inference with panel and cross-sectional data
Ben-Michael, E. (2020) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Automatic Debiased Machine Learning for Instrumental Variable Models of Complier Treatment EffectsPreprint
Singh, R., & Sun, L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University)
General Analytic Considerations
Wright, A. G. C., & Hallquist, M. N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316995808.034
Platt, R. W. (2017) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.728770379.793538450
Comparison of Covariate Balance Weighting Methods in Estimating Treatment Effects
Zhan, M., Fang, Y. G., & Lin, M. T. (2022) · Journal of Systems Science and Complexity · doi:10.1007/s11424-022-1037-4
“…paper gives a brief review of the covariate balancing propensity score method by Imai and Ratkovic (2014), the stable balance weighting procedure by Zubizarreta (2015), the calibration balance weighting approach by Chan, et al. (2016), and the integrated propensity score technique by Sant’Anna, et…”
MethodRevitalising the Silk Road: Evidence from Railway Infrastructure Investments in Northwest ChinaPreprint
Yu, L. B., Tran, T., & Lee, W.-S. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4178930
Data-driven approaches in rheumatology: learning from real-world data
Madrid-García, A. (2022) · doi:10.20868/upm.thesis.72300
Iterative proportional fitting as a balancing method in observational studies
Pickreign, J. D. (2023) · Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology · doi:10.1007/s10742-023-00304-3
“The method proposed by Zubizarreta (2015), Stable Balancing Weights, is similarly designed to minimize the variance of the weights subject to the reduction of the average weight (loss function) for a set of balancing constraints.”
InfluentialQuasi-rerandomization for observational studies
Zhang, H., Su, W., & Yin, G. (2023) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-023-01977-7 · Cited by 1
“Hainmueller [12], Zubizarreta [13] and Chan et al. [14] directly optimized the sample weights to attain a set of predefined balancing conditions.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBarros, G. W. F., Eriksson, M., & Häggström, J. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289316 · Cited by 1
Ouyang, Z., Wang, L., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12070951
“Inverse probability weighting (e.g., Chen et al. [9]; Creemers et al. [10]; Zubizarreta [11]; Hughes et al. [12]) heavily relies on the information from complete cases, which can be problematic when the fraction of completely observed subject is small.”
BackgroundZhou, X., Pang, H., Drake, C., et al. (2024) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2024.2330209
“The synthetic control method (SCM), first proposed by Abadie et al. (2010, 2015), is a widely used approach in the social sciences for evaluating the unit-specific effects of large-scale, infrequent interventions on one or few treated unit(s), with the presence of longitudinal evolution of…”
The Consequences of Elite Action Against ElectionsPreprint
Porter, R., Harden, J. J., Anderson, E. J., de Freitas, G., Dobson, M. R., Hemmen, A., & Schroeder, E. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/3du8x
Causal Analysis Methods for Estimating the Impact of Drought and Cold Events on Crop YieldsPreprint
Mendes, C., Aldebert, K., Brun, F., et al. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5163269
More Than Money: Local Fiscal Choice and Student Achievement After Funding Reform
Ryu, J. E. (2025) · Public Finance and Management · doi:10.1177/15239721251330461
“Instead, this paper applied stable balancing weights (SBWs) (Chattopadhyay et al., 2020; de los Angeles Resa & Zubizarreta, 2020; Zubizarreta, 2015), which achieved covariate balancing up to a user-specified level.”
Weighted Euclidean balancing for a matrix exposure in estimating causal effect
Chen, J., & Zhou, Y. (2025) · The International Journal of Biostatistics · doi:10.1515/ijb-2024-0021
“Most of the current research is based on univariate treatment (binary, multivalued or continuous treatment) (Imai and Ratkovic (2014); Zhu et al. (2015); Fong et al. (2018); Zubizarreta (2015a); Chan et al. (2016); Xiong et al. (2017); Yiu and Su (2018); Dong et al. (2021); Hsu et al. (2022)).”
Do Local Tax Preparers Strengthen the Influence of Tax Policy on Individual Behavior?
Madsen, P. E., & Walton, S. (2025) · National Tax Journal · doi:10.1086/735400
Vachani, A., Murgu, S. D., Maldonado, F., et al. (2025) · Respiration · doi:10.1159/000547686
“A recently developed optimization-based weighting method, stable balancing weights, overcomes the challenge of partial IPD by estimating weights of minimum variance that re-weight IPD to mimic researcher-specified target populations (estimands) [19].”
Lu, S., Jiang, Z., & Ding, P. (2025) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1093/jrsssb/qkaf049
Individualized treatment rules based on adaptive transfer-dragonnet
Huang, Z., Song, Y.-J., & Zhang, Q. (2025) · Statistics and computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-025-10704-9 · Cited by 1
“Although regularization techniques can help mitigate these issues, extreme propensity scores and the imperfections of the imputation model cannot always be completely avoided (Kang and Schafer 2007; Zubizarreta 2015).”
Transfer Learning for Individualized Treatment Rules with Application to Sepsis Patients Data
Wang, A., Wentzlof, K., Rajala, J., Green, M., Zhang, Y., & Yang, S. (2025) · Journal of Data Science · doi:10.6339/25-jds1193
Heterogeneous Causal Effect Analysis and Application Based on Meta-Learners
Fan, H., Zhou, Y., & Chen, L. (2025) · doi:10.1109/isbdas64762.2025.11116859
“Imai, Ratkovic [13] and Zubizarreta [14] try to seek a better way to estimate the weight of the inverse probability to improve performance.”
Vicard, P., Rancoita, P. M. V., Cugnata, F., et al. (2025) · AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10182-025-00535-4
“Accordingly, a different approach to weighting consists in using moment method based on appropriate balancing with respect to covariates, or better in controlling the maximal imbalance; cfr. [18], [19], [20].”
Balancing weights for non-monotone missing data
Dong, J., Wong, R. K. W., & Chan, K. C. G. (2025) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/25-ejs2438
“…average treatment effect (ATE), which can be viewed as a missing data problem with only the response variable missing; see, for example, Zubizarreta [35], Chan et al. [4] and Wong and Chan [31], and Zhao [34] introduced tailored loss functions to show the connection between IPW and balancing…”
Stable Subsampling under Model Misspecification and Covariate Shift
Yang, J., Xu, S., Yang, Z., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3769077
“This approach extends the direct confounder balancing method by [16, 43], commonly used in causal inference to eliminate confounding effects, to cases with multiple levels.”
Rank‐based estimation of propensity score weights via subclassification
Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Richardson, T. S., & Zhou, X. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1002/cjs.70014
Generalized Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects Using the Covariate Balancing Procedure
Orihara, S., Momozaki, T., & Nakagawa, T. (2025) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.70085
“However, their meth-ods require exact fulfillment of covariate balancing conditions, implying that an equational constraint on a moment condition is necessary.”
InfluentialLevicki, R., Trkulja, V., Pašara, V., Prepolec, I., Matovinović, M., Ganoci, L., Šegulja, D., Benčić, M. L., & Božina, T. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15222870
“…case–control analysis (details in Supplementary Material A, A.2 and Figure S1) we (i) used covariate balancing by optimization-based weighting [42,43] to achieve balance between cases and controls on as many characteristics as possible (implemented in package WeightIt [44] in R version 4.5.0…”
InfluentialKalia, S., Saarela, O., Escobar, M., et al. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22599472
Słoczyński, T., Uysal, S. D., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5524562
Słoczyński, T., Uysal, D., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5531722
Forest Kernel Balancing Weights: Outcome‐Guided Features for Causal Inference
Shen, A. A., Ben‐Michael, E., Feller, A., Keele, L., & Murray, J. (2026) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.70720
“Different approaches to balancing weights make different choices about these functions — e.g., re-placing the 2-norm of imbalance with a stronger norm — though they all follow the same principle of minimizing a combination of imbalance and weight dispersion/complexity.”
Adaptive Double Machine Learning via Riesz-Risk Cross-ValidationPreprint
Çetin, T. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6215762
A framework for causal estimand selection under positivity violations
Barnard, M., Huling, J. D., & Wolfson, J. A. (2026) · Biometrics · doi:10.1093/biomtc/ujag014 · Cited by 1
Causal Disentangled Representation Learning for Unbiased Treatment Effect Estimation
Meng, H., Yang, K., Peng, X., et al. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata66926.2025.11400984
“It is worth mentioning that variable balancing methods have also played an important role [12], [13].”
Continual Causal Effect Estimation for Dataset Shifting Streams in Marketing Optimization
Chen, B., Zhang, Y., Han, Y., et al. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata66926.2025.11401623
Dynamic covariate balancing: estimating treatment effects over time with potential local projections
Viviano, D., & Bradic, J. (2026) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asag016 · Cited by 20
Causal Inference from Heterogeneous Data with Missing Data : Application to Critical Care Management
Mayer, I. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2f432d6cz11f8z4d0bza530zbc10fbe668bc
Beyond weighting: Propensity score modeling for causal inference
Zhu, R. J. B. (2026) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802261436960
“30 34 However, unlike these approaches, our article does not aim to achieve covariate balance directly.”
A review and evaluation of doubly robust approaches for estimating average treatment effects
Zhang, J., Lüdtke, O., & Robitzsch, A. (2026) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-026-02999-x · Cited by 1
“…weights can improve performance by increasing stability and covariate balance while reducing weight dispersion, thereby yielding more accurate treatment effect estimates (Chattopadhyay et al., 2020; Deshpande & Kuleshov, 2023; Graham et al., 2012; Imai & Ratkovic, 2014; Zubizarreta, 2015).”
Choi, B. Y. (2026) · Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology · doi:10.1007/s10742-026-00381-0
Jin, Y., Guo, K., & Rothenhaüsler, D. (2026) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · doi:10.1093/jrsssc/qlag019
Triply Robust Panel Estimators
Athey, S. C., Imbens, G. W., Qu, Z., & Viviano, D. (2026) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.70061 · Cited by 3
“For ω j = θ s = 1, and λ nn ∞ , we recover the MC estimator [ABD + 21b].”
Penezić, L., Škegro, S. N., Ganoci, L., et al. (2026) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.1080/14622416.2026.2686869
Johnston, S., Gunja, N., Jha, A., et al. (2026) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-026-08782-3
“…stable-balancing weight methods have been shown to provide ample flexibility with respect to pre-specification of covariate balance goals, and to result in bet - ter post-weighting covariate balance with larger effective sample sizes compared to propensity score weighting [15, 16 ].”
Causal Inference About Treatments Defined on a Continuum
Longford, N. T. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30881-8_91
Mandatory Co-investment: Adoption and Mutual Fund OutcomesPreprint
Zhang, T. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7278800
The effects of enhancing pedestrian-protective infrastructure on intersection safety
Liou, Y., & Chang, H. (2026) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104468
Bhattacharjee, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2026) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2026.2744763
(2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Zubizarreta, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zubizarreta, José R.
- ORCID
- Zubizarreta, José R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-07-03
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 511
- Pages
- 910-922
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2120817734
- Semantic Scholar
- 2425738e5b67fc909c6c41d7609e9d57e6791eb7
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 14.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- covariate balance, inverse probability weighting, convex optimization, duality theory, treatment effect estimation, causal inference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review