Cited by 56

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Model-Based Geostatistics for Prevalence Mapping in Low-Resource Settings

Diggle, Peter J., Giorgi, Emanuele·2016·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.2015.1123158

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modelled PfPR maps are developed by assembling community-based PfPR data from the general population or specific population surveys and used within geostatistical models to provide estimates of infection prevalence at unsampled locations.

    “Modelled PfPR maps are developed by assembling community-based malaria parasite prevalence (PfPR) data from the general population or specific population surveys, such as school based children [12–16], and used within geostatistical models to provide estimates of infection prevalence at unsampled locations [17].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1023/A:1020910605990 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.sste.2011.08.001 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/biomet/92.4.909 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/9781118136188 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/ncomms1840 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01594.x · DOI
  7. Cox D. R., 1955, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 17, 129, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1955.tb00188.x · DOI
  8. 10.1002/9781119115151 · DOI · Paper page
  9. de Wijs H. J., 1951, Journal of the Royal Netherlands Geology and Mining Society, New series, 13
  10. 1953, Journal of the Royal Netherlands Geology and Mining Society, New series, 15
  11. 10.1179/136485913X13789813917463 · DOI
  12. 10.1214/13-STS441 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/1467-9876.00283 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/1467-9876.00113 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/aje/kwh001 · DOI
  16. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001814 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032625 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/rssa.12069 · DOI
  19. 10.1201/9781420072884-c23 · DOI
  20. 10.2307/1400401 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000048 · DOI
  22. Hedt B. L., 2011, Statistics in Medicine, 30, 560, 10.1002/sim.3920 · DOI
  23. 10.1023/A:1009666805688 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/978-1-4471-0657-9 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.csda.2008.05.002 · DOI
  26. Kleinschmidt I., 2007, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 77, 1163, 10.4269/ajtmh.2007.77.1163 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/aje/153.12.1213 · DOI
  28. Krige D. G., 1951, Journal of the Chemical, Metallurgical and Mining Society of South Africa, 52, 119
  29. 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/978-1-4615-7892-5 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90002-3 · DOI
  33. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000958 · DOI
  34. 10.1017/S0031182005007432 · DOI
  35. 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0397 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000438 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1494-6 · DOI
  39. 10.1371/journal.pone.0077641 · DOI
  40. 10.1186/1475-2883-3-7 · DOI
  41. WHO, 2012, Weekly Epidemiological Record, 87, 493
  42. 10.1198/016214504000000241 · DOI
  43. 10.1186/1756-3305-7-326 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Diggle, P. J., & Giorgi, E.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
2016-07-02
Volume
111
Issue
515
Pages
1096-1120
ISSN
  • 0162-1459
  • 1537-274X
Cited by
56
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review