Cited by 6,507Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisPoint processes and geometric inequalitiesSoil Geostatistics and Mapping

Statistics for Spatial Data

Cressie, Noel A. C.·1993·Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119115151

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Robust variograms produced very similar results to the standard variograms.

    “Robust variograms (Cressie, 1993) were also calculated and produced very similar results.”

    From Bayesian Analysis of Agricultural Field Experiments (1999) · cites this paper as Cressie, 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cressie, N. A. C.
Corresponding author
Cressie, Noel A. C.
Venue
Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-09-10
ISSN
1940-6347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2496675188
Cited by
6,507
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 226 · 2025: 195 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 182 · 2022: 266 · 2021: 247 · 2020: 267 · 2019: 250 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 301 · 2016: 288 · 2015: 289 · 2014: 324 · 2013: 285 · 2012: 326
FWCI
30.92
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley series in probability and statistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Point processes and geometric inequalities
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Keywords
spatial statistics, geospatial data, spatial autocorrelation, spatial regression, geostatistics, spatial modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review