The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Epidemiologic and Experimental Evidence
Open accessAbstract
Processed meat intake may be involved in the etiology of colorectal cancer, a major cause of death in affluent countries. The epidemiologic studies published to date conclude that the excess risk in the highest category of processed meat-eaters is comprised between 20% and 50% compared with non-eaters. In addition, the excess risk per gram of intake is clearly higher than that of fresh red meat. Several hypotheses, which are mainly based on studies carried out on red meat, may explain why processed meat intake is linked to cancer risk. Those that have been tested experimentally are (i) that high-fat diets could promote carcinogenesis via insulin resistance or fecal bile acids; (ii) that cooking meat at a high temperature forms carcinogenic heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; (iii) that carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds are formed in meat and endogenously; (iv) that heme iron in red meat can promote carcinogenesis because it increases cell proliferation in the mucosa, through lipoperoxidation and/or cytotoxicity of fecal water. Nitrosation might increase the toxicity of heme in cured products. Solving this puzzle is a challenge that would permit to reduce cancer load by changing the processes rather than by banning processed meat.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pischon, T., Lahmann, P. H., Boeing, H., Friedenreich, C., Norat, T., Tjønneland, A., Halkjaer, J., Overvad, K., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Boutron-Ruault, M.-C., et al. (2006) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djj246 · Cited by 554
Cited by
Colorectal Carcinoma: A General Overview and Future Perspectives in Colorectal Cancer
Mármol, I., Sánchez-de-Diego, C., Pradilla Dieste, A., Cerrada, E., & Rodriguez Yoldi, M. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18010197 · Cited by 1,525
Food sources of nitrates and nitrites: The physiologic context for potential health benefits
Hord, N. G., Tang, Y., & Bryan, N. S. (2009) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.27131 · Cited by 1,069
Nutrients, foods, and colorectal cancer prevention
Song, M., Garrett, W. S., & Chan, A. T. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.035 · Cited by 700
Major Dietary Protein Sources and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Women
Bernstein, A. M., Sun, Q., Hu, F. B., Stampfer, M. J., Manson, J. E., & Willett, W. C. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.915165 · Cited by 573
Bastide, N. M., Pierre, F. H. F., & Corpet, D. E. (2011) · Cancer Prevention Research · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.capr-10-0113 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Santarelli, R., Pierre, F., & Corpet, D.
- Venue
- Nutrition and Cancer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-144
- ISSN
- 0163-5581 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119903193
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Epidemiologic and Experimental Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01635580701684872
- The paper
- Santarelli, R., Pierre, F., & Corpet, D. (2008). Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Epidemiologic and Experimental Evidence. Nutrition and Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635580701684872
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.