Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of fructo‐oligosaccharides ingestion on fecal bifidobacteria and selected metabolic indexes of colon carcinogenesis in healthy humans

Bouhnik, Yoram, Flourié, Bernard, Riottot, Michel, Bisetti, Nathalie, Gailing, Marie‐Frédérique, Guibert, Alain, Bornet, Francis, Rambaud, Jean‐Claude·1996·Nutrition and Cancer

Abstract

Fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) are a mixture of oligosaccharides consisting of glucose linked to fructose units. They are not digested in the human small intestine but fermented in the colon, where they could specifically promote the growth of some species of the indigenous microflora, especially bifidobacteria. We assessed in healthy humans the effects of FOS ingestion in fecal bifidobacteria and selected metabolic indexes potentially involved in colonic carcinogenesis. Twenty volunteers randomly divided into two groups were studied for three consecutive 12-day periods. During the ingestion period, they received 12.5 g/day FOS or placebo (saccharose) in three oral doses. Stools were regularly collected and analyzed. FOS ingestion led to an increase in fecal bifidobacterial counts [7.9 +/- 0.5 to 9.1 +/- 0.3 (SE) log colony-forming units/g wet wt, p < 0.01] and beta-fructosidase activity (9.6 +/- 1.9 to 13.8 +/- 1.9 IU/g dry wt, p < 0.01). In contrast, FOS ingestion had no significant effect on fecal total anaerobes, pH, the activities of nitroreductase, azoreductase, and beta-glucuronidase, and the concentrations of bile acids and neutral sterols. We conclude that ingestion of FOS, at a clinically tolerated dose of 12.5 g/day, led to an increase in colonic bifidobacteria. This effect was not associated in healthy humans with beneficial changes in various factors potentially involved in the pathogenesis of colonic cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01635589609514459

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1271/bbb1961.53.667 · doi:10.1271/bbb1961.53.667
  2. Clevenger MA, 1988, J Am Coll Toxicol, 7, 643, 10.3109/10915818809019540 · doi:10.3109/10915818809019540
  3. Hidaka H, 1986, Bifidobacteria Microflora, 5, 37, 10.12938/bifidus1982.5.1_37 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Stone‐Dorshow T, 1987, Am J Clin Nutr, 46, 61, 10.1093/ajcn/46.1.61 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hosoya N, 1988, J Clin Biochem Nutr, 5, 67, 10.3164/jcbn.5.67 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/BF00270790 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/food.19870310528 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06813.x · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06813.x · Paper page
  9. Wang X, 1993, J Appl Bacteriol, 75, 373, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb02790.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. De Vries W, 1967, Biochim Biophys Acta, 136, 415, 10.1016/0304-4165(67)90001-3 · DOI
  11. Scardovi V, 1965, Ann Microbiol Enzymol, 15, 19
  12. 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90192-2 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hoover DG, 1991, Bifidobacteria Microflora, 10, 113, 10.12938/bifidus1982.10.2_113 · doi:10.12938/bifidus1982.10.2_113
  14. 10.1007/BF01575871 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Nair PP, 1988, Am J Clin Nutr, 48, 768, 10.1093/ajcn/48.3.768 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/01635589109514163 · DOI
  17. 10.1271/bbb1961.54.1639 · doi:10.1271/bbb1961.54.1639
  18. Marteau P, 1990, Am J Clin Nutr, 52, 685, 10.1093/ajcn/52.4.685 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1007/BF00051359 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1002/ijc.2910420205 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kampman E, 1992, Cancer Res, 54, 3186
  22. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1990.tb00148.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. Goldin BR, 1976, JNCI, 25, 371, 10.1093/jnci/57.2.371 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/0009-8981(82)90387-4 · doi:10.1016/0009-8981(82)90387-4
  25. Grundy SM, 1965, J Lipid Res, 6, 397, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)39310-X · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1210/jcem-24-4-367 · doi:10.1210/jcem-24-4-367
  27. Mallet AK, 1988, Role of the Gut Flora in Toxicity and Cancer, 347, 10.1016/B978-0-12-599920-5.50019-4 · DOI
  28. Bouhnik Y, 1992, Gastroenterology, 102, 875, 10.1016/0016-5085(92)90172-U · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1172/JCI111738 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Goldin BR, 1984, Am J Clin Nutr, 39, 756, 10.1093/ajcn/39.5.756 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/BF02087431 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Rowland IR, 1993, J Appl Bacteriol, 14, 667, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb05201.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. Fuller R, 1992, Probiotics. The Scientific Basis, 377, 10.1007/978-94-011-2364-8_14 · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2364-8_14
  34. 10.1051/rnd:19791005 · DOI
  35. 10.1136/gut.28.6.675 · doi:10.1136/gut.28.6.675
  36. 10.1007/BF02536637 · doi:10.1007/bf02536637

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Bouhnik, Y., Flourié, B., Riottot, M., Bisetti, N., Gailing, M., Guibert, A., Bornet, F., & Rambaud, J.
Venue
Nutrition and Cancer
Published
1996-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
21-29
ISSN
  • 0163-5581 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7914
OpenAlex
W2220516585
Cited by
221
References
1
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of fructo‐oligosaccharides ingestion on fecal bifidobacteria and selected metabolic indexes of colon carcinogenesis in healthy humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01635589609514459
The paper
Bouhnik, Y., Flourié, B., Riottot, M., Bisetti, N., Gailing, M., Guibert, A., Bornet, F., & Rambaud, J. (1996). Effects of fructo‐oligosaccharides ingestion on fecal bifidobacteria and selected metabolic indexes of colon carcinogenesis in healthy humans. Nutrition and Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635589609514459

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.