Effect of ascorbic acid dose taken with a meal on nitrosoproline excretion in subjects ingesting nitrate and proline
Abstract
We determined the dose of ascorbic acid (ASC) given to subjects with a standard 400-calorie meal that inhibited N-nitrosoproline (NPRO) formation when we gave 400 mg of nitrate one hour before and 500 mg of L-proline with the standard meal. Volunteers consumed their normal US diets but restricted their intakes of nitrate, proline, NPRO, and ASC. NPRO and N-nitrososarcosine (NSAR) were determined in the 18-hour urines by methylation followed by gas chromatography-thermal energy analysis. Mean NPRO yields were 10.7, 41.9, 33.2, 22.3, and 23.1 nmol for groups of 9-25 subjects taking proline alone, proline + nitrate, and proline + nitrate + 120, 240, and 480 mg of ASC, respectively. There was a significant trend to lower NPRO yields as the ASC dose was raised. These results correspond to inhibitions by ASC of 28%, 62%, and 60%, respectively. Pairwise comparison showed that each group taking ASC formed significantly less NPRO than the group given only proline + nitrate. Mean NSAR yields were 9.0 nmol when proline alone was taken and 16.9-24.0 nmol when proline + nitrate + ASC was taken, with no trend to increase as the ASC dose was raised. However, NPRO and NSAR yields in individual urines were correlated with each other. We concluded that 120 mg of ASC taken with each meal (360 mg/day) would significantly reduce in vivo nitrosamine formation, similar to tests by Leaf and co-workers (Carcinogenesis 8, 791-795, 1987) in which the reactants were taken between meals. The inhibitory dose of ASC may be < 120 mg/meal when doses of nitrate and proline are not taken.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Any possible harmful effect of nitrosation is very effectively inhibited by the antioxidants that accompany nitrate in vegetables.
“It is pertinent to note that any possible harmful effect of nitrosation (which assumes the presence of secondary amines in the saliva or stomach) is very effectively inhibited [77] by the antioxidants that accompany nitrate in vegetables [45].”
From Dietary Nitrate Supplementation and Exercise Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [77]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Mirvish, S. S., Grandjean, A. C., Reimers, K. J., Connelly, B. J., Chen, S. C., Morris, C. R., Wang, X., Haorah, J., & Lyden, E. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Nutrition and Cancer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 106-110
- ISSN
- 0163-5581 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7914
- OpenAlex
- W2056622043
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition and Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA036727, P-30CA-36727)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Keywords
- vitamin C, nitrosamine formation, nitrate, proline, meal timing, dose-response relationship, urinary excretion, chemoprevention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Antioxidants, Ascorbic Acid, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nitrates, Nitrosamines, Proline, Reference Values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review