The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie
Abstract
This study investigated conditions that enable viewers to predict future events while viewing a movie. Predictions about future events can be supported by visual, auditory, and discourse information. These information sources serve to emphasize or introduce the individually necessary, and jointly sufficient, conditions that support predictive inference processes. They may also introduce new, anomalous information that can be understood in terms of future story events. In Experiment 1, viewers were instructed to generate predictions while watching the James Bond movie, Moonraker (Broccoli & Gilbert, 1979).The presence of support through visual and discourse modes increased the likelihood that participants would generate a specific prediction. Furthermore, the likelihood of generating a given prediction increased with multiple sources of visual and discourse modes of support. In Experiment 2, participants provided think‐aloud protocols at different locations in the film, but were not instructed to generate predictions. As in Experiment 1, viewers made predictions when the sources were available, even though they were not specifically instructed to do so. Furthermore, the likelihood that viewers in Experiment 2 would generate the same predictions as in Experiment 1 also increased as a function of the amount of support. The data are interpreted in terms of pragmatic and causal factors in comprehension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text
Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1991) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/0304-422x(91)90007-c · Cited by 151
Self-citation
Cited by
Situation models in language comprehension and memory
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 · Cited by 2,877
Self-citationThe Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x · Cited by 1,345
SERT: Self-Explanation Reading Training
McNamara, D. S. (2004) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3801_1 · Cited by 519
Cohn, N. (2013) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12016 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Magliano, J. P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A.
- Venue
- Discourse Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 199-224
- ISSN
- 0163-853X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6950
- OpenAlex
- W2093095196
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01638539609544973
- The paper
- Magliano, J. P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. Discourse Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.