The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis
Abstract
Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) is used as a technique for measuring the coherence of texts. By comparing the vectors for 2 adjoining segments of text in a high‐dimensional semantic space, the method provides a characterization of the degree of semantic relatedness between the segments. We illustrate the approach for predicting coherence through reanalyzing sets of texts from 2 studies that manipulated the coherence of texts and assessed readers’ comprehension. The results indicate that the method is able to predict the effect of text coherence on comprehension and is more effective than simple term‐term overlap measures. In this manner, LSA can be applied as an automated method that produces coherence predictions similar to propositional modeling. We describe additional studies investigating the application of LSA to analyzing discourse structure and examine the potential of LSA as a psychological model of coherence effects in text comprehension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Flesch, R. (1948) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057532 · Cited by 5,391
An introduction to latent semantic analysis
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539809545028 · Cited by 4,880
Self-citationMcNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1 · Cited by 1,341
Self-citation
Cited by
An introduction to latent semantic analysis
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539809545028 · Cited by 4,880
Self-citationSentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics
Li, Y., McLean, D., Bandar, Z. A., O'Shea, J. D., & Crockett, K. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2006.130 · Cited by 819
The Secret Life of Pronouns: Flexibility in Writing Style and Physical Health
Campbell, R. S., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01419 · Cited by 430
Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition
Louwerse, M. M. (2011) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x · Cited by 399
Language style matching in writing: synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry.
Ireland, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020386 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K.
- Venue
- Discourse Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 285-307
- ISSN
- 0163-853X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6950
- OpenAlex
- W2089150068
- Cited by
- 749
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01638539809545029
- The paper
- Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
