Cited by 819Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesSemantic Web and Ontologies

Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics

Open access
Li, Y., McLean, D., Bandar, Z.A., O'Shea, J.D., Crockett, K.·2006·IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Abstract

Sentence similarity measures play an increasingly important role in text-related research and applications in areas such as text mining, Web page retrieval, and dialogue systems. Existing methods for computing sentence similarity have been adopted from approaches used for long text documents. These methods process sentences in a very high-dimensional space and are consequently inefficient, require human input, and are not adaptable to some application domains. This paper focuses directly on computing the similarity between very short texts of sentence length. It presents an algorithm that takes account of semantic information and word order information implied in the sentences. The semantic similarity of two sentences is calculated using information from a structured lexical database and from corpus statistics. The use of a lexical database enables our method to model human common sense knowledge and the incorporation of corpus statistics allows our method to be adaptable to different domains. The proposed method can be used in a variety of applications that involve text knowledge representation and discovery. Experiments on two sets of selected sentence pairs demonstrate that the proposed method provides a similarity measure that shows a significant correlation to human intuition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tkde.2006.130

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., McLean, D., Bandar, Z. A., O'Shea, J. D., & Crockett, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Published
2006-08
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
1138-1150
ISSN
1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121184547
Cited by
819
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 55
FWCI
17.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Salford Manchester
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
Keywords
sentence similarity, semantic networks, corpus statistics, lexical databases, word order, commonsense knowledge, domain adaptation, short text similarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review