Does the gender asterisk (“Gendersternchen”) as a special form of gender-fair language impair comprehensibility?
Open accessAbstract
Gender-fair language makes women and people of other genders, their interests, and achievements more visible. However, critics argue that gender-fair language impairs the comprehensibility and aesthetic appeal of texts. This study tests these assumptions specifically concerning the gender asterisk, a form of gender-fair language that makes people outside the male-female dichotomy typographically more visible in German. In two experiments with N = 133 and N = 110, subjects were randomly given one of three versions of a text, either with masculine-only forms (e.g. die Spieler*innen, ~“the fe*male players”), the gender asterisk in its plural form (e.g. die Spieler*innen, “the fe*male players”), or the gender asterisk in its singular form (e.g. der*die Spieler*in, “the*the fe*male player”). Subsequently, participants completed a comprehensibility questionnaire. Both experiments show that the gender asterisk in its singular form impairs comprehensibility, but only Experiment 1 shows an impairment due to its plural form.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies observed impaired comprehension in specific conditions with gender-fair forms.
“or observed impaired comprehension in specific conditions (e.g., Friedrich et al., 2024).”
From What affects people’s use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Friedrich et al., 2024
Cites
Does Sex‐biased Job Advertising “Aid and Abet” Sex Discrimination? <sup>1</sup>
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1973) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb01290.x · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What affects people’s use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review
Lange, E., & von Stockhausen, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1657753 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Friedrich, M. C. G., Gajewski, S., Hagenberg, K., Wenz, C., & Heise, E.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Friedrich, Marcus C. G.
- Venue
- Discourse Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-07-29
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 439-461
- ISSN
- 0163-853X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6950
- OpenAlex
- W4401090945
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Discourse Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistic research and analysis
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- gender-inclusive language, comprehensibility, German language, readability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review