Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5Library Science and Information LiteracyEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesInformation Science and Libraries

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical Information Literacy Beyond the University: Lessons From Service in a Women's Health Interest Group

Fountain, Kathleen Carlisle·2013·Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian

Abstract

Library instruction methods most frequently focus on teaching students searching skills to navigate the maze of library databases to locate appropriate research materials. The current theory of critical information literacy instruction calls on librarians to spend more of their time in the classroom focused on understanding the social, political, and cultural construction of knowledge. In this article, the author provides a case study of the information environment in the National Women's Health Network, a women's health interest group, to help librarians facilitate nuanced discussions with students on the applicability of interest group literature inside and outside of the university classroom.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01639269.2013.750200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Association of College and Research Libraries, 2000, Information literacy competency standards for higher education
  2. Andres Gary, 2012, CQ Press guide to interest groups and lobbying in the United States, 335
  3. Box-Steffensmeier Janet, 2005, . Written assignments: Legislatures and interest groups: Political science 367
  4. Bradley Katharine W., 2012, CQ Press guide to interest groups and lobbying in the United States, 335
  5. 10.1016/S0734-3310(02)00087-3 · DOI
  6. Cullen, Rowena. Empowering patients through health information literacy training.IFLA Conference Proceedings, pp.1–12. November
  7. Davis Flora, 1991, Moving the mountain: The women's movement in America since 1960
  8. Fountain Kathi Carlisle, 2006, Women's Health Activist Newsletter
  9. Hershey Marjorie, 2002, Y301: Political parties and interest groups
  10. Judd Vaughan C., 2006, Reference Services Review, 34, 12, 10.1108/00907320510631571 · DOI
  11. Kaczorowski Electra, 2006, Women's Health Activist Newsletter
  12. Kersh Rogan, 2012, CQ Press guide to interest groups and lobbying in the United States, 347
  13. Leach Evan, 2008, The Medical Library Association health information literacy research project: Consumer health information survey summary report
  14. Lock Margaret, 1998, The politics of women's health: Exploring agency and autonomy, 178
  15. McKay Amy, 2007, Political Science 30:119: Lobbying
  16. Menacker Fay, 2005, National vital statistics reports 54.4
  17. Morgen Sandra, 2002, Into our own hands: The women's health movement in the United States, 1969–1990
  18. National Institutes of Health, 2006, The WHI legacy to future generations of women: Update on scientific contributions
  19. National Women's Health Network, 2006, Elective cesarean section: Who decides?
  20. National Women's Health Network, 2012, “A brief history of the NWHN. National Women's Health Network
  21. National Women's Health Network, 2012, Menopause hormone therapy. National Women's Health Network
  22. Nutefall Jennifer E., 2009, Public Services Quarterly, 5, 250, 10.1080/15228950903199271 · DOI
  23. Ruzek Sheryl Burt, 1978, The women's health movement: Feminist alternatives to medical control
  24. Ruzek Sheryl Burt, 1999, Journal of the American Medical Women's Association, 54, 4
  25. Schardt Connie, 2010, Introduction to evidence-based practice
  26. Smith Chioma Uzoigwe, 2011, Health, 3, 416, 10.4236/health.2011.37069 · DOI
  27. Stobbe Mike, 2005, Washington Post
  28. Swanson Troy A., 2004, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 259, 10.1353/pla.2004.0038 · DOI
  29. United States, 1991, Women at midlife: Consumers of second-rate health care?: Hearing before the subcommittee on housing and consumer interests of the Select Committee on Aging, House of Representatives, One Hundred
  30. Viswanathan Meera, 2006, Cesarean delivery on maternal request
  31. Wessels-Cruz Kathleen L., 2008, A history of drug regulation in the United States 1902–2008: Effects on women's health
  32. 10.1080/15512169.2010.494485 · DOI
  33. 10.2307/1395227 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Fountain, K. C.
Affiliations
Washington State University Vancouver (US)
Corresponding author
Fountain, Kathleen Carlisle
Venue
Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian
Published
2013-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
24-45
ISSN
  • 0163-9269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-4546
OpenAlex
W1975576380
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Information Science and Libraries
Keywords
critical information literacy, library instruction, social construction of knowledge, information environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Information Literacy Beyond the University: Lessons From Service in a Women's Health Interest Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01639269.2013.750200
The paper
Fountain, K. C. (2013). Critical Information Literacy Beyond the University: Lessons From Service in a Women's Health Interest Group. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2013.750200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.