CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentCriminal Justice and Penology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Espouse of Women in the Online Romance Fraud World: Role of Sociocultural Experiences and Digital Technologies

Abubakari, Yushawu·2024·Deviant Behavior
DOI 10.1080/01639625.2023.2263137
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Online romance fraud is a form of cybercrime that has pervasive consequence on both individuals and organizations. As against previous studies that predominantly focus on male scammers, this study examines the influence of sociocultural experiences and technological modalities on women’s involvement in online romance fraud in Tamale, Ghana. The study employs a blend of feminist criminology and Cressey’s Fraud Triangle Theory to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the engagement of women in the scamming phenomenon in this region. Employing the experiences of fifteen (15) female scammers, the results show that sociocultural backgrounds of female scammers, combined with the internet’s inherent opportunities, play a pivotal role in determining the engagement. The sociocultural background of women, coupled with the technological nature of the act, plays a significant role in driving their engagement in these illicit activities: motivation to offend and opportunity through social relationships. This study emphasizes how technological pathways enhance the opportunities available to women, highlighting the ways in which the digital landscape of such frauds potentially allows women to evade legal and societal repercussions. In conclusion, this study highlights the need for a comprehensive approach that considers both the technological aspects and the underlying societal constructs that facilitate them.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01639625.2023.2263137

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1017/cri.2020.15 · DOI
  2. Abubakari, Y. 2021. “The Reasons, Impacts and Limitations of Cybercrime Policies in Anglophone West Africa: A Review.” Social Space Journal 1(20):1–22.
  3. 10.1177/0022427899036002001 · DOI
  4. 10.1101/2021.04.27.21255462 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s42087-021-00227-w · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s13369-020-04802-1 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.10.002 · DOI
  8. 10.2307/j.ctvpj7h19 · DOI
  9. Asamoah, B. 2018. Sakawa. Movement Publishing. https://www.amazon.com/Sakawa-Ben-Asamoah/dp/1513628445.
  10. 10.1080/10246029.2009.9627562 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/10246029.2009.9627562 · DOI
  12. Bachmann, M. 2010. “The Risk Propensity and Rationality of Computer Hackers.” International Journal of Cyber Criminology 4(1/2):643–56.
  13. Barnor Barno, J. N., R. Boaten, E. A. Kolog, and A. Afful-Dadzie (2020). “Rationalizing Online Romance Fraud.” In The Eyes of the Offender AMCIS 2020 Proceedings August, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  14. 10.1016/J.AVB.2015.04.002 · DOI
  15. Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  16. Boateng, R., O. Longe, V. Mbarika, and I. Avevor. 2011. “Cyber Crime and Criminality in Ghana: Its Forms and Implications.” Amcis 2:85–100. April 2015 (http://works.bepress.com/richardboateng/1/).
  17. 10.1177/0162243910366148 · DOI
  18. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262017367.001.0001 · DOI
  19. 10.1300/J015v24n01_04 · DOI
  20. 10.1017/S0001972017001152 · DOI
  21. 10.1108/978-1-78635-445-720161012 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/bjc/42.4.743 · DOI
  23. Chesney-Lind, M. and R. G. Shelden. 2013. Girls, Delinquency, and Juvenile Justice. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
  24. 10.1080/07418828800089871 · DOI
  25. 10.2307/2063296 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1557183 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/15564886.2016.1173157 · DOI
  28. Dukku, M. K. 2019. “The Nature, Causes and Consequences of Cyber Crime in Tertiary Institutions in Gombe, Gombe State, Nigeria.” International Journal of Educational Research and Management Technology 4(1):100–15.
  29. Ebenezer, A., A. Oluwadamilola, E. Ibunkunoluwa, and B. Roberts. 2016. “Gendered Alternative to Cyber Fraud Participation: An Assessment of Technological Driven Crime in Lagos State, Nigeria.” Gender and Behaviour 14(3):7672–92.
  30. 10.1186/1475-9276-11-1 · DOI
  31. Flick, U., E. von Kardorff, and I. Steinke (2004). A Companion to Qualitative Research, edited by U. Flick E. Von Kardoff, I. Steinke. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications Inc.
  32. 10.1007/s00355-011-0629-z · DOI
  33. Fukuyama, F. 1995. “Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity.” The World and I 10:264–68.
  34. 10.1207/s15327965pli0501_1 · DOI
  35. 10.1108/JFC-12-2018-0136 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1007/s12117-013-9202-8 · DOI
  37. Hutchings, A. and Y. T. Chua. 2017. “Gendering 10 cybercrime.” Pp. 167–188 in Cybercrime Through an Interdisciplinary Lens, edited by Holt Thomas J. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
  38. 10.4324/9781315744902-25 · DOI
  39. Lazarus, S. 2018. “Birds of a Feather Flock Together: The Nigerian Cyber Fraudsters (Yahoo Boys) and Hip Hop Artists.” Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society 19(2):63–80.
  40. 10.1111/hojo.12485 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1745-6606.1997.tb00827.x · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1007/s10610-016-9332-z · DOI
  43. Longhurst, R. 2019. “Semi Structured Interview and Focus Group.” Key Methods in Georgraphy 53(9):1689–99.
  44. 10.1007/s12103-013-9217-3 · DOI
  45. 10.1108/17542411011081383 · DOI
  46. 10.1177/000312240807300604 · DOI
  47. 10.1073/pnas.1211286109 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1177/0022427818820902 · DOI
  49. 10.1080/07418825.2018.1543723 · DOI
  50. 10.1080/1081602X.2017.1302890 · DOI
  51. 10.1017/asr.2014.51 · DOI
  52. 10.1163/17087384-12340034 · DOI
  53. 10.4135/URL · DOI
  54. 10.1177/1088767908314270 · DOI
  55. 10.4324/9780203930311 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/he/9780199590278.003.0002 · DOI
  57. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00505.x · DOI
  58. 10.1201/b16912 · DOI
  59. 10.17576/gema-2019-1901-06 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1080/00224545.2010.503721 · DOI
  61. 10.4156/jdcta.vol4.issue7.4 · DOI
  62. 10.1177/1059601199242003 · DOI
  63. 10.1177/0003122413484150 · DOI
  64. 10.2478/s13374-013-0158-9 · DOI
  65. 10.17781/P002278 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.iref.2021.09.016 · DOI
  67. 10.4324/9780203201503 · DOI
  68. 10.4324/9781315135007 · DOI
  69. 10.1108/JFC-10-2020-0204 · DOI
  70. 10.1177/0022427803256074 · DOI
  71. 10.1007/978-0-387-74733-0_9 · DOI
  72. 10.1177/0951629813477275 · DOI
  73. 10.3390/bs9040035 · DOI
  74. Warner, J. 2011. “Understanding Cyber-Crime in Ghana: A View from Below.” Understanding Cyber-Crime in Ghana: A View from Below 5(1):736–49.
  75. 10.1111/socf.12088 · DOI
  76. 10.4324/9781315538877 · DOI
  77. 10.1109/CW.2011.32 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Abubakari, Y.
Affiliations
University of Wrocław (PL)
Corresponding author
Abubakari, Yushawu
ORCID
Abubakari, Yushawu
Venue
Deviant Behavior
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2023-09-25
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
708-735
ISSN
  • 0163-9625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0456
DOI
10.1080/01639625.2023.2263137
OpenAlex
W4387025399
Cited by
26
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Deviant Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
sociocultural experience, digital technologies, feminist criminology, fraud triangle, Tamale, Ghana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review