Cited by 7Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsAnesthesia and Pain Management

Epidural analgesia associations with depression, PTSD, and bonding at 2 months postpartum

Handelzalts, Jonathan E., Levy, Sigal, Krissi, Haim, Peled, Yoav·2022·Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

The research aim was to study the possible effect of epidural analgesia, as well as other possible demographic/obstetric variables and subjective birth experience on postpartum depression, PTSD, and impaired bonding. This was a longitudinal study of 254 women who gave birth at the maternity wards of a large tertiary health center and responded to questionnaires at T1 (Childbirth Experience Questionnaire and level of fatigue question; in person, 1-4 days postpartum) and at T2 (Postnatal Depression Scale, Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire, and the City Birth Trauma Scale; online-two months postpartum). Obstetric and demographic data were taken from medical files. Having a previous psychiatric diagnosis and higher levels of fatigue significantly predicted worse outcomes in all measures (level of fatigue was not associated with the City Birth Trauma birth-related symptoms factor). Having higher education, being primiparous, worse birth experience, and longer second stage of birth predicted worse outcomes in some measures. Although epidural administration had no effect on any of the outcome variables, special attention should be devoted to women who had long second-stage births and/or suffering from postpartum fatigue to prevent postpartum psychopathology. In addition, demographic variables, such as primiparity, education, and prior psychopathology diagnosis should be considered to treat women and prevent postpartum psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0167482x.2022.2081146

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Handelzalts, J. E., Levy, S., Krissi, H., & Peled, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yafo (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Handelzalts, Jonathan E.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2022-06-28
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
488-494
ISSN
  • 0167-482X (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-8942
OpenAlex
W4283643531
Cited by
7
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
epidural analgesia, postpartum depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, postpartum bonding, childbirth experience, birth trauma, postpartum fatigue, primiparity, educational attainment, second stage of labor, obstetric factors
MeSH terms
Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Analgesia, Epidural, Depression, Postpartum, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review