Cited by 104Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsInfant Health and Development

Postpartum fatigue and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Wilson, Nathan, Lee, Jin Joo, Bei, Bei·2019·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background New parents are vulnerable to fatigue and depressive symptoms. Many studies have reported significant positive correlations between the two in postpartum parents, but the size of correlations varies considerably between studies. The relationship between postpartum fatigue and depression is yet to be systematically synthesized and meta-analyzed.Methods A PROSPERO registered systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42017065240) was conducted on the correlation between fatigue and depression within the first two years postpartum in parents. Moderation analysis was used to examine the influence of demographic and measurement factors on the effect sizes.Results Thirty-five eligible papers were identified (34 on mothers, 1 on fathers). The meta-analytic summary effect size for simultaneously measured fatigue and depressive symptoms among women in the postpartum period was r = 0.52, 95% CI [0.45, 0.59], p < .001. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the strength of the correlation between studies. This heterogeneity was not accounted for by demographic (e.g., infant age, maternal age, population type) or methodology (e.g., measurement) related moderators.Limitations Studies not reporting or providing correlation between fatigue and depression were not included. Unable to assess some moderators due to limited sample size.Conclusions There is a strong correlation between fatigue and depressive symptoms among women in the first two years after child-birth, but a high degree of heterogeneity in correlation strength exists between studies. Careful assessment of both fatigue and depression when either symptom is reported could facilitate accurate differential diagnosis and prioritizing treatment in postpartum women. Further implications for assessment, treatment, and future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.032

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, N., Lee, J. J., & Bei, B.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Bei, Bei
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
246
Pages
224-233
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903687339
Cited by
104
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Monash University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
postpartum fatigue, postpartum depression, depressive symptoms, mothers, fathers, effect size heterogeneity, differential diagnosis, postpartum period
MeSH terms
Depression, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Parents, Comorbidity, Depression, Postpartum, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review