The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Case study approach in neuropsychological research
Abstract
The contribution of the neurological case study approach for establishing the functional organisation of cognitive subsystems is assessed. A number of potential problems are considered, including “resource artefacts”, the nature of the lengthy clinical/experimental procedure used, statistical selection artefacts, reorganisation of function, atypical lateralisation, and the existence of associated deficits. It is argued that, despite these problems, the case study approach is the most promising neuropsychological technique for providing information on the functional organisation of cognitive subsystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781446212967.n15 · Cited by 3,749
The assessment of aphasia and related disorders
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,258
On data-limited and resource-limited processes
Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90004-3 · Cited by 2,403
THE TOKEN TEST: A SENSITIVE TEST TO DETECT RECEPTIVE DISTURBANCES IN APHASICS
DE RENZI, E., & VIGNOLO, L. A. (1962) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/85.4.665 · Cited by 1,862
VISUAL CAPACITY IN THE HEMIANOPIC FIELD FOLLOWING A RESTRICTED OCCIPITAL ABLATION
WEISKRANTZ, L., WARRINGTON, E. K., SANDERS, M. D., & MARSHALL, J. (1974) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/97.1.709 · Cited by 1,465
The Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory
Warrington, E. K. (1975) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/14640747508400525 · Cited by 1,464
Battig, W. F., Tulving, E., & Donaldson, W. (1973) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421962 · Cited by 1,412
Bergum, B. O., & Requin, J. (1980) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422120 · Cited by 1,042
Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach
Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1973) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/bf01067101 · Cited by 1,027
The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders
BENTON, A. L. (1973) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.23.4.388 · Cited by 850
Cited by
Specific impairments of planning
Shallice, T. (1982) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1982.0082 · Cited by 3,741
Self-citationCrawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2002) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00224-x · Cited by 829
Humphreys, G. W., & Evett, L. J. (1985) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00045684 · Cited by 323
Double dissociation without modularity: Evidence from connectionist neuropsychology
Plaut, D. C. (1995) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/01688639508405124 · Cited by 306
Face perception after brain injury: Selective impairments affecting identity and expression
Young, A. W., Newcombe, F., Haan, E. H. F. D., small, M., & Hay, D. C. (1993) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/116.4.941 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Shallice, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1979-11
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 183-211
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973192261
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Case study approach in neuropsychological research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01688637908414450
- The paper
- Shallice, T. (1979). Case study approach in neuropsychological research. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688637908414450
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
