Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A prospective study of children with head injuries: IV specific cognitive deficits

Chadsick, Oliver, Rutter, Michael, Shaffer, David, Shrout, Patrick E.·1981·Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology

Abstract

Twenty-five children with a head injury resulting in a posttraumatic amnesia of at least one week were compared with an individually matched group of 25 children with orthopedic injuries. Both groups were studied a few weeks after the accident and the again at 4 months, 1 year and 21/4 years after the injury. The head injury group showed a persistent deficit on the WISC Performance IQ scale; the deficit on the Verbal IQ scale was more transient. An extensive battery of neuropsychological tests was employed to identify specific deficits not shown on the WISC. On the whole, these tests showed a pattern of results similar to that found with the WISC, and in most cases children without deficits on the Performance IQ scale of the WISC also did not show deficits on the battery of specific tests. However, in a few cases, tests of speed of visuo-motor or visuo-spatial functioning picked up deficits attributable to the head injury which occurred in children with normal scores on the WISC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01688638108403117

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chadsick, O., Rutter, M., Shaffer, D., & Shrout, P. E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
1981-07
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
101-120
ISSN
0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068445562
Cited by
196
References
1
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.