Cited by 304Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Assessing Executive Functions in Children: Biological, Psychological, and Developmental Considerations

Anderson, Vicki·1998·Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Abstract

Executive functions may be defined as those skills necessary for purposeful, goal-directed activity, and are generally considered to be largely mediated by the frontal and prefrontal cortices of the brain. These cerebral regions are relatively immature during childhood, with development thought to be a protracted process which continues into early adolescence. While early theorists suggested that executive skills were not functional until cerebral maturity, recent research provides evidence that such skills can be elicited in early childhood. The aim of this paper is to review current theories of development of executive functions throughout childhood. In keeping with contemporary approaches to child neuropsychology, three critical dimensions will be evaluated; biological factors, psychological dimensions, and developmental trajectories. In addition, the literature which addresses assessment of these functions will be examined, with reference to developmental trajectories observed in normal populations, and in brain-damaged samples, where there may be disruption to the underlying neural substrates thought to be subsuming these functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/713755568

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The discrepancy between traditional executive function measures and real life behavior may also reflect the assessment environment, which is generally a quiet, one-on-one, structured setting with minimal distractions and very different to most home, classroom, or social environments.

    “This discrepancy may also reflect the assessment environment, which is generally a quiet, one-on-one, structured setting with minimal distractions”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as V. Anderson, 1998

  • Adult-derived tests often lack adequate normative data necessary to differentiate normal and abnormal performance within a developmental context.

    “they often lack adequate normative data necessary to differentiate normal and abnormal performance within a developmental context”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as V. Anderson, 1998

  • The novelty factor and level of complexity of adult-derived tests are likely to be greater in children.

    “the novelty factor and level of complexity of such tests are likely to be greater in children”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as V. Anderson, 1998

  • Adult-derived executive function tests may be of little interest or relevance to children.

    “these tests may be of little interest or relevance to children”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as V. Anderson, 1998

  • There is a strong possibility that adult-derived tests tap different skills and neural networks in children or require greater cognitive resources.

    “there is a strong possibility that these tests tap different skills (and neural networks) in children or at least require greater cognitive resources”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as V. Anderson, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, V.
Corresponding author
Anderson, Vicki
Venue
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Published
1998-05
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
319-349
ISSN
  • 0960-2011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0694
OpenAlex
W2103552094
Cited by
304
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
executive function, children, frontal cortex, prefrontal cortex, brain maturation, cognitive development, executive function assessment, child neuropsychology, brain damage, developmental trajectories, goal-directed behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review