The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preserved learning in amnesic patients: Perspectives from research on direct priming
Abstract
An important source of evidence for preserved learning ability in amnesic patients is provided by the phenomenon of repetition or direct priming: the facilitative effect of an encounter with an item on subsequent processing of the same item. In this article we consider a series of experiments that have attempted to clarify the nature of priming in amnesic patients and normal subjects. The experiments indicate that there may be two varieties of priming, one dependent upon the activation of preexisting memory representations, the other dependent upon newly formed memory representations. We suggest that the former type of priming is preserved even in severely amnesic patients, whereas the latter may be preserved only in mildly-to-moderately amnesic patients. Implications of research on preserved learning for the development of remedial strategies are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.
Mandler, G. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.87.3.252 · Cited by 2,849
Cohen, N. J., & Squire, L. R. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7414331 · Cited by 2,296
Further analysis of the hippocampal amnesic syndrome: 14-year follow-up study of H.M.
Milner, B., Corkin, S., & Teuber, H.-L. (1968) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(68)90021-3 · Cited by 1,229
Cited by
Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.
Squire, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195 · Cited by 5,376
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419 · Cited by 5,256
Implicit memory: History and current status.
Schacter, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501 · Cited by 2,983
Self-citationDeclarative and Nondeclarative Memory: Multiple Brain Systems Supporting Learning and Memory
Squire, L. R. (1992) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.232 · Cited by 1,282
Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.002355 · Cited by 983
Metadata
- Authors
- Schacter, D. L., & Graf, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 727-743
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0168-8634
- OpenAlex
- W1993462708
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preserved learning in amnesic patients: Perspectives from research on direct priming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01688638608405192
- The paper
- Schacter, D. L., & Graf, P. (1986). Preserved learning in amnesic patients: Perspectives from research on direct priming. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638608405192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.