The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of an attention-training program
Abstract
Attention Process Training (APT), a hierarchical, multilevel treatment program, was designed to remediate attention deficits in brain-injured persons. The program incorporates current theories in the experimental attention literature. Four brain-injured subjects, varying widely in both etiology of injury and time post onset, underwent intensive cognitive remediation including 5 to 10 weeks of specific attention training. Results are displayed using a single subject multiple baseline across behaviors design. All four subjects demonstrated significant gains in attention following the initiation of attention training. Remediation of another cognitive function (visual processing) was not associated with alterations in attention behavior. The merits of a process-specific approach to cognitive rehabilitation are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Broadbent, D. E. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10037-000 · Cited by 4,337
Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion
Gronwall, D. M. A. (1977) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367 · Cited by 2,395
The concept of working memory: a view of its current state and probable future development
Baddeley, A. (1981) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(81)90020-2 · Cited by 375
Cited by
Mindfulness training modifies subsystems of attention
JHA, A. P., KROMPINGER, J., & BAIME, M. J. (2007) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.7.2.109 · Cited by 1,580
Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: A Clinical Practice Guideline
Duncan, P. W., Zorowitz, R., Bates, B., Choi, J. Y., Glasberg, J. J., Graham, G. D., Katz, R. C., Lamberty, K., & Reker, D. (2005) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000180861.54180.ff · Cited by 1,046
A comprehensive review of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)
TOMBAUGH, T. (2006) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.07.006 · Cited by 648
van Ginneken, N., Tharyan, P., Lewin, S., Rao, G. N., Meera, S., Pian, J., Chandrashekar, S., & Patel, V. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009149.pub2 · Cited by 575
Virtual Reality in Brain Damage Rehabilitation: Review
Rose, F. D., Brooks, B. M., & Rizzo, A. A. (2005) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.241 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1987-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-130
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0168-8634
- OpenAlex
- W1972265376
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of an attention-training program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01688638708405352
- The paper
- Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (1987). Effectiveness of an attention-training program. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638708405352
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
