Cited by 375Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

The concept of working memory: a view of its current state and probable future development

Baddeley, Alan·1981·Cognition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0277(81)90020-2

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 3-back task challenges working memory, which refers to the individual capacity to temporarily maintain active relevant information to perform an ongoing task.

    “This task challenges working memory, which refers to the individual capacity to temporarily maintain active relevant information to perform an ongoing task [46,47].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baddeley, A.
Corresponding author
Baddeley, Alan
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-07
Volume
10
Issue
1-3
Pages
17-23
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062525835
Cited by
375
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 22
FWCI
20.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
working memory, working memory models, cognitive architecture
MeSH terms
Eidetic Imagery, Humans, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Psychological, Speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review