Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition
Abstract
Two experiments examined priming from semantically transparent and opaque suffix-derivations (including pseudo-derived words such as corner), using the masked cross-modal priming technique. Experiment 1 showed that in a Dutch lexical decision task, latencies to root targets were facilitated when visually presented primes were transparent derivations of the target, regardless of whether targets were presented visually or auditorily. Pseudo-derivations only provided weak evidence for priming and only when targets were presented visually. In Experiment 2 we tested transparent and opaque priming more thoroughly in a French lexical decision task by using the incremental priming technique in combination with a psychophysical approach. The results showed that opaque as well as transparent derivations facilitated the visual and auditory processing of their (pseudo-) root. However, transparent priming occurred earlier than opaque priming in the visual modality. Moreover, when facilitation from opaque derivations appeared in the visual modality, transparent derivations produced a larger facilitation effect. We argue that our findings illustrate the existence of two distinct processing systems underlying early morphological processing: a morpho-orthographic system and a morpho-semantic system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Morphological influences reflect both morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic processing.
“According to the account of morphological processing proposed by Diependaele et al. (2005, 2009; see also Morris et al., 2011), such morphological influences not only reflect morpho-orthographic processing, but also morpho-semantic processing.”
From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Diependaele et al., 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Self-citationHebrew Brain vs. English Brain: Language Modulates the Way It Is Processed
Bick, A. S., Goelman, G., & Frost, R. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21583 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“However, other studies demonstrate that morphological processing is clearly modulated by semantic considerations (Diependaele, Sandra, & Grainger, 2005 ; Giraudo & Grainger, 2001 ; Feldman, 2000 ).”
- Authors
- Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J.
- Affiliations
- a University of Antwerp , Antwerp , Belgium
- b CNRS and Université de Provence , Aix-en-Provence , France
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 75-114
- ISSN
- 0169-0965
- 1464-0732
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review