Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language
Abstract
Recent research in psychology and neuroscience has demonstrated that co-speech gestures are semantically integrated with speech during language comprehension and development. The present study explored whether gestures also play a role in language learning in adults. In Experiment 1, we exposed adults to a brief training session presenting novel Japanese verbs with and without hand gestures. Three sets of memory tests (at five minutes, two days and one week) showed that the greatest word learning occurred when gestures conveyed redundant imagistic information to speech. Experiment 2 was a preliminary investigation into possible neural correlates for such learning. We exposed participants to similar training sessions over three days and then measured event-related potentials (ERPs) to words learned with and without co-speech gestures. The main finding was that words learned with gesture produced a larger Late Positive Complex (indexing recollection) in bi-lateral parietal sites than words learned without gesture. However, there was no significant difference between the two conditions for the N400 component (indexing familiarity). The results have implications for pedagogical practices in foreign language instruction and theories of gesture-speech integration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Observing gestures triggers semantic processing.
“Because observing gesture triggers semantic processing [30,31] it is conceivable that gestures linked to L2 grammatical morphemes could help children learn.”
From Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 282
- Authors
- Kelly, S. D., McDevitt, T., & Esch, M.
- Affiliations
- Colgate University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kelly, Spencer D.
- ORCID
- Kelly, Spencer D.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 313-334
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- OpenAlex
- W2021298762
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language and Cognitive Processes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Keywords
- co-speech gestures, word learning, foreign language learning, gesture-speech integration, Japanese verbs, event-related potentials, late positive complex, N400, recollection, familiarity, parietal cortex, adult language acquisition, foreign language teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review