The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution
Abstract
Natural languages contain probabilistic constraints that influence the resolution of ambiguities. Current models of sentence processing agree that probabilistic constraints affect syntactic ambiguity resolution, but there has been little investigation of the constraints themselves-what they are, how they differ in their effects on processing, and how they interact with one another. Three different types of probabilistic constraints were investigated: “pre-ambiguity” plausibility information, information about verb argument structure frequencies, and “post-ambiguity” constraints that arrive after the introduction of the ambiguity but prior to its disambiguation. Reading times for syntactically ambiguous sentences were compared to reading times for unambiguous controls in three self-paced reading experiments. All three kinds of constraints were found to be helpful, and when several constraints converged, ambiguity resolution was facilitated compared to when constraints conflicted. The importance of these constraint interactions for ambiguity resolution models is discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, the ambiguityis stronglyconstrained bythe frequencywith which the ambiguous verb occurs in transitive and passive structures, of which reduced relative clauses are a special type (MacDonald, 1994; MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994; Trueswell, 1996).”
From FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition (2002) · cites this paper as MacDonald, 1994
Citations
Cites
Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix
Steiger, J. H. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245 · Cited by 4,621
Constraints on variables in syntax
Ross, J. R. (1967) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 4,102
Baltin, M. R. (1985) · Language · doi:10.2307/414493 · Cited by 2,785
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259
Self-citationInteraction of information in word recognition.
Morton, J. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0027366 · Cited by 2,206
Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition
Marslen‐Wilson, W. D. (1987) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9 · Cited by 1,817
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.1.60 · Cited by 1,530
Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech
Marslen‐Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-x · Cited by 1,464
The cognitive basis for linguistic structures1
Bever, T. G. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677139.003.0001 · Cited by 1,301
Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading
Coltheart, M. (1987) · Cited by 1,195
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Altmann G. T. M., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.
- Berg G., 1991, Learning recursive phrase structure: Combining the strengths of PDP and x-bar syntax.
- Bever T. G., 1970, Cognitive development of language.
- Bresnan J., 1992, The mental representation of grammatical relations.
- Burgess, C. and Hollbach, S. C. A computational model of syntactic ambiguity as a lexical process. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp.263–269. pp.
- Carlson G. N., 1988, Syntax and semantics, Vol. 21: Thematic relations.
- Ford M., 1982, The mental representation of grammatical relations.
- Hawkins J. A., 1990, Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 223
- 10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228 · DOI
- Kawamoto A., 1988, Lexical ambiguity resolution: Computational, linguistic, and psychological perspectives.
- Levin B., 1986, Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 623
- Maslin J., 1991, New York Times, C8
- 10.1037/0278-7393.18.1.69 · DOI
- Pearlmutter, N. J. and MacDonald, M. C. Plausibility and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Society. pp.498–503. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. In, pp.
- Trueswell, J. C. and Tanenhaus, M. K. Consulting temporal context during sentence comprehension: Evidence from the monitoring of eye movements in reading. 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp.492–497. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. In, pp.
- Trueswell J. C., Journal of Memory and Language.
- Tyler L. K., 1989, Lexical representation and process.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–380 of 380
Finding identity in the midst of ambiguity: case and number disambiguation in Basque
Ristić, B., Mancini, S., & Molinaro, N. (2020) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2020.1734639 · Cited by 2
Sentence processing in high proficient Kannada–English bilinguals: a reaction time study
Ravi, S. K., & Chengappa, S. K. (2014) · International Journal of Multilingualism · doi:10.1080/14790718.2014.964248 · Cited by 2
Alonso, L., & León, J. A. (2011) · Revista signos · doi:10.4067/s0718-09342011000300001 · Cited by 2
Post-lexical and prosodic phonological processing
Warren, P., Nolan, F., Grabe, E., & Holst, T. (1995) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969508407109 · Cited by 2
Exploración cognitiva de la lectura I: Presentación de un nuevo instrumento
López-Higes, R., Fernández, S. M. R., Villoria, S., & Mayoral, J. A. (2001) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 2
Moisik, S. R. (2009) · Cited by 2
Producing case errors in Russian
Natalia, S., Anna, S., & Tatiana, M. (2016) · Cited by 2
How children avoid kindergarten paths
Meroni, L., & Crain, S. (2003) · Cited by 2
High Vs Low: Turkish Parser’s Attachment Preferences to Relative Clauses
Turan, C. (2020) · ISPEC International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities · doi:10.46291/ispecijsshvol4iss3pp241-270 · Cited by 2
Mechanisms of Sentence Processing
(1987) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5237.003.0009 · Cited by 2
Noun Sequence Statistics Affect Serial Recall and Order Recognition Memory
Schwering, S. C., & MacDonald, M. C. (2023) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00092 · Cited by 2
Self-citationEsaulova, Y. (2015) · heiDOK (Heidelberg University) · doi:10.11588/heidok.00018275 · Cited by 2
Meroni, L. (2013) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · Cited by 2
Edeleva, J., Chrabaszcz, A. V., & Демарева, В. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021820902429 · Cited by 1
García, E. Á., & González, J. M. I. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13030409 · Cited by 1
Lei, Y., Liu, L., Chen, J., Tang, C., Fan, S., Cai, Y., & Ding, G. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15091159 · Cited by 1
Sentence-frame frequency effects
Liu, I.-M., Sue, I.-R., Chen, S.-C., & Ting-hsi, C. (2006) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960601000795 · Cited by 1
Eye Movements and Thematic Processing
Liversedge, S. P. (2003) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044451020-4/50016-5 · Cited by 1
최소영, & Koh, S. (2012) · 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물 · doi:10.22172/cogbio.2012.24.2.001 · Cited by 1
Effects of Pragmatic Inference on Phoneme Identification
Rohde, H., & Ettlinger, M. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
The Role of Frequency in the Processing of giving and receiving Events in Korean
Yun, H., & Yi, E. (2019) · 어학연구 · doi:10.30961/lr.2019.55.2.253 · Cited by 1
Kognitivna obrada sintaktički dvosmislenih konstrukcija
Vladisavljević, M., & Bogetić, K. (2021) · Psihologijske teme · doi:10.31820/pt.30.3.2 · Cited by 1
Chen, Y. (2022) · Journal of Contemporary Educational Research · doi:10.26689/jcer.v6i11.4465 · Cited by 1
Learning speaker-specific linguistic ‘style’ is mediated by deviance from common language use
Trainin, N., & Shetreet, E. (2023) · Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/langcog.2023.32 · Cited by 1
Sätze und Texte verstehen und produzieren
Kaup, B., & Dudschig, C. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-68476-4_15 · Cited by 1
Why Unaccusatives Have it Easy: Reduced Relative Garden Path Effects and Verb Type
Grove, K. (2011) · Cited by 1
Memory limitations and chunking are variable and cannot explain language structure
MacDonald, M. C. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15000898 · Cited by 1
Self-citationSentence Processing in a Second Language: Ambiguity Resolution in German Learners of English
Rah, A. (2009) · Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) · Cited by 1
Context effects on frame probability independent of verb sense ambiguity
Keller, F., & Scheepers, C. (2006) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
What is retained about common ground? Distinct effects of linguistic and visual co-presencePreprint
Galati, A., & Brennan, S. E. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6at5w · Cited by 1
The role of lexical and contextual information in parsing ambiguous sentences in Greek
Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003) · Cited by 1
Sentence Processing Among Native vs. Nonnative Speakers: Implications for Critical Period Hypothesis
Nezakat-Alhossaini, M., Youhanaee, M., & Moinzadeh, A. (2014) · Journal of research in applied linguistic studies/Journal of research in applied linguistics
Procesamiento de frases e información léxica
Viladevall, J. D. (2003)
The effects of payoffs and feedback on the disambiguation of relative clauses
Quetglas, L. C. (2014) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library)
Robust models of human parsing
Keller, F. (2004) · doi:10.3115/1621445.1621447
Quantification Scope Ambiguity Resolution: Evidence from Persian and English
Asadollahfam, H., & Lotfi, A. R. (2010) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v3n2p152
Usage-based preferences in written sentence production: The role of local and global statistics
Hemforth, B., Fayol, M., & Pacton, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar · doi:10.21248/hpsg.2010.8
Quantification and Negation Scope Ambiguity Resolution: An Interlanguage Study.
Asadollahfam, H., & Lotfi, A. R. (2010)
Online Resolution of English NP/S Ambiguity in Korean Adult EFL Learners
Choi, S., & Lee, M. (2016) · Korean Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.18855/lisoko.2016.41.1.007
Perspective Taking in Definite Reference Resolution
Zheng, X. (2015) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
Hocking, I. (2010) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)
Accounting for Variation Across Languages: A Constraint-Based Perspective
Thornton, R., Gil, M., & MacDonald, M. C. (2007)
Self-citationIdentifying Syntactic Ambiguities in Single-Parse
Sentence, A., & Daimi, K. (2001)
Katsika, K. (2017) · Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · doi:10.26262/istal.v17i2.5575
Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution and Task Influence by Korean Learners of English
Lim, J. H. (2017) · 어학연구 · doi:10.30961/lr.2017.53.2.321
A Corpus Study of Verb Bias in Spanish
Dietrich, A. J., & Balukas, C. (2012)
The Role of Korean -(n)un in Comprehending Negated Disjunction on the Direct Object Position
이온순 (2017) · The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal · doi:10.24303/lakdoi.2017.25.3.51
Sandbank, B., Vershueren, N., & Whitmore, J. M. (2006) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
James, A. N. (2017) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Language and Cognitive Functions in a Neurological Tumour Population: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study
Fowler, K. (2018) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17134817
Clifton, C., Meyer, A. S., Wurm, L. H., & Rebecca Treiman, A. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop204019
Grammatical Gender Processing in Standard Arabic as a First and a Second Language
Alamry, A. (2019) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-24204
The architecture underlying syntactic processing
van Gompel, R. P. G. (1999) · Enlighten: Theses (The University of Glasgow)
Frequency-dependent Regularization in Constituent Ordering Preferences.
Liu, Z., & Morgan, E. (2020) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
(2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444324044.refs
(2016) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.11_12177
Muckel, S. (2002) · Deutscher Universitätsverlag eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-663-11891-6_7
Psicolinguística e Modelos Baseados no Uso / Psycholinguistics and Usage-based Models
Filho, N. S. D. S., & Godoy, M. C. (2022) · Revista de Estudos da Linguagem · doi:10.17851/2237-2083.30.2.1103-1133
Verb subcategorization frequency differences between business-news and balanced corpora
Roland, D., Jurafsky, D. S., Menn, L., Gahl, S., Elder, E., & Riddoch, C. (2000) · doi:10.3115/1604683.1604691
Choe, J., Yoshida, M., & Cole, J. (2022) · Glossa Psycholinguistics · doi:10.5070/g601136
Constraint satisfaction in large language modelsPreprint
Jacobs, C. L., & MacDonald, M. C. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xfnpb
Self-citationMultiple paths to sentence interpretation: Case studies of older adults and persons with aphasiaPreprint
Thothathiri, M. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/wbsgv
Shoghi, S., Arslan, S., Bastiaanse, R., & Popov, S. (2024) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103840
Klavan, J., Blumenthal‐Dramé, A., & Veismann, A. (2025) · Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1515/cllt-2023-0110
Liu, Z., & Lin, C.-J. C. (2025) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218251332420
LINGUISTIC MEANS OF REPRODUCING IMPLIED SENSE IN THE TRANSLATION OF R. FROST’S POETRY
Kykot, V. (2025) · Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philoligy · doi:10.32342/3041-217x-2025-1-29-22
D’Alesio, V., Porrini, A. T., Greco, M., & Moro, A. (2025) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2025.104019
Suzuki, T. (2002)
Rôle du relativiseur dans l'attachement des propositions relatives ambiguës en français
Luche, C. D. (2008) · HAL
Number maintenance in subject-verb agreement: evidence from Basque
Ristić, B., Molinaro, N., & Mancini, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Language Sciences · doi:10.3389/flang.2026.1657112
Sandstedt, J. J., Kamenetski, A., & Anderssen, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6637602
Shi, Y., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688261432066
Pereltsvaig, A. M. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009658256.014
Zhou, J., Chen, S., Wang, S., Liu, H., & Liu, R. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.70232
Discrepant Prosodic Effects on PP-Attachment Ambiguity Processing by L1 and L2 Listeners
Zhang, Y., Tang, E., & Ding, H. (2026) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-026-10280-7
No evidence for rational adaptation during verb-argument processing in aphasia
Milburn, E. A., Dickey, M. W., Hayes, R. A., & Warren, T. C. (2026) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2026.2738945
Metadata
- Authors
- MacDonald, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- MacDonald, Maryellen C.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-201
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- OpenAlex
- W2154590657
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language and Cognitive Processes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- syntactic ambiguity resolution, chance constraints, constraint interaction, reading time, self-paced reading, sentence processing, ambiguity disambiguation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review