The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution
Abstract
Natural languages contain probabilistic constraints that influence the resolution of ambiguities. Current models of sentence processing agree that probabilistic constraints affect syntactic ambiguity resolution, but there has been little investigation of the constraints themselves-what they are, how they differ in their effects on processing, and how they interact with one another. Three different types of probabilistic constraints were investigated: “pre-ambiguity” plausibility information, information about verb argument structure frequencies, and “post-ambiguity” constraints that arrive after the introduction of the ambiguity but prior to its disambiguation. Reading times for syntactically ambiguous sentences were compared to reading times for unambiguous controls in three self-paced reading experiments. All three kinds of constraints were found to be helpful, and when several constraints converged, ambiguity resolution was facilitated compared to when constraints conflicted. The importance of these constraint interactions for ambiguity resolution models is discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, the ambiguityis stronglyconstrained bythe frequencywith which the ambiguous verb occurs in transitive and passive structures, of which reduced relative clauses are a special type (MacDonald, 1994; MacDonald, Pearlmutter, & Seidenberg, 1994; Trueswell, 1996).”
From FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition (2002) · cites this paper as MacDonald, 1994
Citations
Cites
Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix
Steiger, J. H. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245 · Cited by 4,621
Constraints on variables in syntax
Ross, J. R. (1967) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 4,102
Baltin, M. R. (1985) · Language · doi:10.2307/414493 · Cited by 2,785
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259
Self-citationInteraction of information in word recognition.
Morton, J. (1969) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0027366 · Cited by 2,206
Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition
Marslen‐Wilson, W. D. (1987) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9 · Cited by 1,817
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.1.60 · Cited by 1,530
Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech
Marslen‐Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-x · Cited by 1,464
The cognitive basis for linguistic structures1
Bever, T. G. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677139.003.0001 · Cited by 1,301
Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading
Coltheart, M. (1987) · Cited by 1,195
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Altmann G. T. M., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.
- Berg G., 1991, Learning recursive phrase structure: Combining the strengths of PDP and x-bar syntax.
- Bever T. G., 1970, Cognitive development of language.
- Bresnan J., 1992, The mental representation of grammatical relations.
- Burgess, C. and Hollbach, S. C. A computational model of syntactic ambiguity as a lexical process. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp.263–269. pp.
- Carlson G. N., 1988, Syntax and semantics, Vol. 21: Thematic relations.
- Ford M., 1982, The mental representation of grammatical relations.
- Hawkins J. A., 1990, Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 223
- 10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228 · DOI
- Kawamoto A., 1988, Lexical ambiguity resolution: Computational, linguistic, and psychological perspectives.
- Levin B., 1986, Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 623
- Maslin J., 1991, New York Times, C8
- 10.1037/0278-7393.18.1.69 · DOI
- Pearlmutter, N. J. and MacDonald, M. C. Plausibility and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Society. pp.498–503. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. In, pp.
- Trueswell, J. C. and Tanenhaus, M. K. Consulting temporal context during sentence comprehension: Evidence from the monitoring of eye movements in reading. 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp.492–497. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. In, pp.
- Trueswell J. C., Journal of Memory and Language.
- Tyler L. K., 1989, Lexical representation and process.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56 · Cited by 2,698
Ellis, N. C. (2002) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263102002024 · Cited by 2,230
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259
Self-citationThe misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences
Ferreira, F. (2003) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00005-7 · Cited by 907
Saccadic eye movements and cognition
Liversedge, S., & Findlay, J. M. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01418-7 · Cited by 862
More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005 · Cited by 791
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. T. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.19.3.528 · Cited by 791
Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density
Jaeger, T. F. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002 · Cited by 728
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2015) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1500031x · Cited by 803
Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension
Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.5.3.263 · Cited by 682
The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children
Trueswell, J. C., Алексеевна, С. И., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00032-3 · Cited by 695
The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition
AMBRIDGE, B., KIDD, E., ROWLAND, C. F., & THEAKSTON, A. L. (2015) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s030500091400049x · Cited by 589
How language production shapes language form and comprehension
MacDonald, M. C. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226 · Cited by 596
Self-citationThe effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation
Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00022-6 · Cited by 532
Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity
Grodner, D. J., & Gibson, E. A. F. (2005) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_7 · Cited by 470
Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bice, K., & Perrotti, L. (2014) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124937 · Cited by 438
SELECTION AND INFORMATION: A CLASS-BASED APPROACH TO LEXICAL RELATIONSHIPS
Resnik, P. (1993) · Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 422
Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations.
Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. J. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.23.1.71 · Cited by 386
Probabilistic Modeling in Psycholinguistics: Linguistic Comprehension and Production
Jurafsky, D. (2003) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5582.003.0006 · Cited by 357
Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012497770-9.50009-1 · Cited by 339
A Probabilistic Constraints Approach to Language Acquisition and Processing
Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1999) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2304_8 · Cited by 335
Self-citationSnedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. (2004) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001 · Cited by 372
On the nature and evolution of the neural bases of human language
LIEBERMAN, P. H. (2002) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.10171 · Cited by 331
The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language
KAISER, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.002 · Cited by 314
Modelling Parsing Constraints with High-dimensional Context Space
Lund, C. B. A. K. (1997) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/016909697386844 · Cited by 315
Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence
Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2006) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.014 · Cited by 308
Speakers’ eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation
Hanna, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.008 · Cited by 308
Partner‐Specific Adaptation in Dialog
Brennan, S. E., & Hanna, J. E. (2009) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01019.x · Cited by 317
Stallings, L. M., MacDonald, M. C., & O’Séaghdha, P. G. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2586 · Cited by 301
Self-citationResolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints
Spivey-Knowlton, M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00647-4 · Cited by 299
Thematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts
McRae, K., & Ferretti, T. R. (1997) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/016909697386835 · Cited by 303
Spivey, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.24.6.1521 · Cited by 297
Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input
Lévy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907664106 · Cited by 299
Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation
Gahl, S., & Garnsey, S. M. (2004) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2004.0185 · Cited by 287
The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation
Arnold, J. E. (2001) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3102_02 · Cited by 250
Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, discourse
Burgess, C., Livesay, K. L., & Lund, K. (1998) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539809545027 · Cited by 279
The Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking
Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2006) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_65 · Cited by 279
Constraints on sentence comprehension
Gibson, E. A. F., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01187-5 · Cited by 276
Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities
Kurtzman, H. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1993) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90042-t · Cited by 271
Self-citationPlausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study.
Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.940 · Cited by 271
Adjunct Attachment Is Not a Form of Lexical Ambiguity Resolution
Traxler, M. J., Pickering, M. J., & Clifton, C. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2600 · Cited by 265
TYLER, L. K., Marslen‐Wilson, W. D., Randall, B., Wright, P. K., Devereux, B. J., Zhuang, J., Papoutsi, M., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq369 · Cited by 263
A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns
McRae, K., Hare, M. L., Elman, J. L., & Ferretti, T. R. (2005) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193221 · Cited by 248
Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses
Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.004 · Cited by 247
Self-citationCaplan, D. N., Hildebrandt, N., & Makris, N. (1996) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/119.3.933 · Cited by 243
Ni, W. (1996) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/016909696387196 · Cited by 229
The diagnosis and cure of garden paths
Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1994) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/bf02143947 · Cited by 222
Ambiguity in sentence processing
Altmann, G. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01153-x · Cited by 219
Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts
Pickering, M. J., Traxler, M. J., & Crocker, M. W. (2000) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2708 · Cited by 212
Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2001) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1010443001646 · Cited by 222
How to Prune a Garden Path by Nipping It in the Bud: Fast Priming of Verb Argument Structure
Trueswell, J. C., & Kim, A. E. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2565 · Cited by 213
McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2001) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309010440030101 · Cited by 208
Brennan, S. E., Galati, A., & Kuhlen, A. K. (2010) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(10)53008-1 · Cited by 222
Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque
Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Vergara‐Martínez, M., de la Cruz‐Pavía, I., & Laka, I. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.012 · Cited by 206
Representation, Processing and Working Memory in a Second Language
Juffs, A. (2004) · Transactions of the Philological Society · doi:10.1111/j.0079-1636.2004.00135.x · Cited by 195
Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs
Gilboy, E., Sopena, J. M. G., Cliftrn, C., & Frazier, L. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00636-y · Cited by 190
The Effects of Collocational Strength and Contextual Predictability in Lexical Production
Gregory, M., Raymond, W. D., Bell, A., Fosler‐Lussier, E., & Jurafsky, D. S. (1999) · Cited by 187
Information‐theoretical Complexity Metrics
Hale, J. (2016) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12196 · Cited by 186
Deutsch, A., & Shlomo Bentin, A. (2001) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2768 · Cited by 184
Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation.
McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.21.1.134 · Cited by 182
A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research
Marsden, E. J., Thompson‐Lee, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716418000036 · Cited by 198
The on-line processing of written irony
Filik, R., & Moxey, L. M. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.005 · Cited by 180
The Influence of Focus Operators on Syntactic Processing of Short Relative Clause Sentences
Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., & Underwood, G. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755827 · Cited by 179
Reanalysis in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models
van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2001) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2773 · Cited by 176
Norcliffe, E., Harris, A. C., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1080373 · Cited by 173
Hare, M. L., Jones, M. N., Thomson, C. E., Kelly, S., & McRae, K. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.009 · Cited by 172
Young Children's Overgeneralizations with Fixed Transitivity Verbs
Brooks, P. J., Tomasello, M., DODSON, K., & Lewis, L. B. (1999) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00097 · Cited by 170
Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Anes, M. D., Weeks, P. A., & McFarlane, D. K. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.2.324 · Cited by 164
Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations
Slattery, T. J., Sturt, P., Christianson, K., Yoshida, M., & Ferreira, F. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.001 · Cited by 160
Constraint Satisfaction Accounts of Lexical and Sentence Comprehension
MacDonald, M. C., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012369374-7/50016-x · Cited by 153
Self-citationBeckman, M. E., & Edwards, J. (2000) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00139 · Cited by 154
A general, abstract model of incremental dialogue processing
Schlangen, D., & Skantze, G. (2009) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/1609067.1609146 · Cited by 151
Linear Optimality Theory as a Model of Gradience in Grammar
Keller, F. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0014 · Cited by 147
Burgess, C., & Livesay, K. L. (1998) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200655 · Cited by 147
Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1993) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/h0078826 · Cited by 140
People Use their Knowledge of Common Events to Understand Language, and Do So as Quickly as Possible
McRae, K., & Matsuki, K. (2009) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00174.x · Cited by 142
Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: evidence from eye movements
Hanna, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2801_5 · Cited by 136
Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: evidence from eye movements
Hanna, J. (2003) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.10.002 · Cited by 135
Inferring gender from name phonology.
Cassidy, K. W., Kelly, M. H., & Sharoni, L. J. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.128.3.362 · Cited by 129
Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity
Gennari, S. P., & Poeppel, D. (2003) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00069-6 · Cited by 127
Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production
Schwering, S. C., & MacDonald, M. C. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068 · Cited by 128
Self-citationWide-Coverage Probabilistic Sentence Processing
Crocker, M. W., & Brants, T. (2000) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1026560822390 · Cited by 125
The Role of Lexical Heads in Parsing: Evidence from German
Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., Scheepers, C., & Strube, G. (1997) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/016909697386871 · Cited by 122
Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution
van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.003 · Cited by 122
Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. N. (1996) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03213298 · Cited by 120
Human Language and Our Reptilian Brain
LIEBERMAN, P. H. (2002) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv201xjgd · Cited by 122
Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing
Frazier, L. (1995) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/bf02143161 · Cited by 118
The Dynamics of Meaning in Memory
Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1998) · Cited by 113
Variation in Second Language Acquisition
Tsimpli, I. M. (2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/01489-9 · Cited by 113
Aging and Resolution of Quantifier Scope Effects
Kemtes, K. A., & Kemper, S. (1999) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/54b.6.p350 · Cited by 111
Time in language: Event duration in language comprehension
Coll-Florit, M., & Gennari, S. P. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.09.002 · Cited by 104
Filik, R., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.07.004 · Cited by 104
A General, Abstract Model of Incremental Dialogue Processing
Schlangen, D., & Skantze, G. (2011) · Dialogue & Discourse · doi:10.5087/dad.2011.105 · Cited by 102
The time course of anticipatory constraint integration
Kukona, A., Fang, S.-Y., Aicher, K. A., Chen, H., & Magnuson, J. S. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.002 · Cited by 139
Dussias, P. E., & Cramer Scaltz, T. R. (2008) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.09.004 · Cited by 98
Localization of Syntactic and Semantic Brain Responses using Magnetoencephalography
Service, E., Helenius, P., Maury, S., & Salmelin, R. H. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1193 · Cited by 98
Folk, J. R., & Morris, R. K. (2003) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03196085 · Cited by 96
Verb sense and verb subcategorization probabilities
Roland, D., & Jurafsky, D. S. (2002) · Natural language processing · doi:10.1075/nlp.4.17rol · Cited by 95
Cohn, A. C. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.003.0002 · Cited by 94
Competition and recency in a hybrid network model of syntactic disambiguation
Stevenson, S. (1994) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/bf02145044 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- MacDonald, M. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- MacDonald, Maryellen C.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-201
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- OpenAlex
- W2154590657
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language and Cognitive Processes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- syntactic ambiguity resolution, chance constraints, constraint interaction, reading time, self-paced reading, sentence processing, ambiguity disambiguation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review