Cited by 109Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultisensory perception and integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A survey of multimodal deep generative models

Open access
Suzuki, Masahiro, Matsuo, Yutaka·2022·Advanced Robotics

Abstract

Multimodal learning is a framework for building models that make predictions based on different types of modalities. Important challenges in multimodal learning are the inference of shared representations from arbitrary modalities and cross-modal generation via these representations; however, achieving this requires taking the heterogeneous nature of multimodal data into account. In recent years, deep generative models, i.e. generative models in which distributions are parameterized by deep neural networks, have attracted much attention, especially variational autoencoders, which are suitable for accomplishing the above challenges because they can consider heterogeneity and infer good representations of data. Therefore, various multimodal generative models based on variational autoencoders, called multimodal deep generative models, have been proposed in recent years. In this paper, we provide a categorized survey of studies on multimodal deep generative models.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01691864.2022.2035253

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Stein BE, 1993, The merging of the senses
  2. Kingma DP, 2014, International Conference on Learning Representations
  3. van den Oord A, Dieleman S, Zen H, et al. Wavenet: a generative model for raw audio; 2016. Preprint arXiv:1609.03499. · arXiv
  4. Van Oord A, 2016, International Conference on Machine Learning
  5. Rezende D, 2015, International Conference on Machine Learning
  6. Kingma DP, 2018, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  7. Xu C, Tao D, Xu C. A survey on multi-view learning; 2013. Preprint arXiv:1304.5634. · arXiv
  8. Tsai Y-HH, 2021, International Conference on Learning Representations
  9. Sohn K, 2015, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 28, 3483
  10. Tschannen M, Bachem O, Lucic M. Recent advances in autoencoder-based representation learning; 2018. Preprint arXiv:1812.05069. · arXiv
  11. Srivastava N, Salakhutdinov R. Learning representations for multimodal data with deep belief nets. In: International Conference on Machine Learning Workshop, Vol. 79; 2012. p. 3.
  12. Sohn K, 2014, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 27, 2141
  13. 10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993 · DOI
  14. Higgins I, Matthey L, Pal A, et al. beta-vae: learning basic visual concepts with a constrained variational framework. ICLR; 2016.
  15. Vincent P, 2010, J Machine Learning Res, 11, 3371
  16. Liu M-Y, Breuel T, Kautz J. Unsupervised image-to-image translation networks; 2017. Preprint arXiv:1703.00848. · arXiv
  17. Wu M, Goodman N. Multimodal generative models for compositional representation learning; 2019. Preprint arXiv:1912.05075. · arXiv
  18. Suzuki M, Nakayama K, Matsuo Y. Improving bi-directional generation between different modalities with variational autoencoders; 2018. Preprint arXiv:1801.08702. · arXiv
  19. Daunhawer I, 2021, Pattern Recognit, 12544, 459
  20. Wu M, 2018, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  21. Suzuki M, Nakayama K, Matsuo Y. Joint multimodal learning with deep generative models; 2016. Preprint arXiv:1611.01891. · arXiv
  22. Tian Y, Engel J. Latent translation: crossing modalities by bridging generative models; 2019. Preprint arXiv:1902.08261. · arXiv
  23. Hsu W-N, Glass J. Disentangling by partitioning: a representation learning framework for multimodal sensory data; 2018. Preprint arXiv:1805.11264. · arXiv
  24. Shi Y, 2021, International Conference on Learning Representations
  25. 10.1609/aaai.v34i07.6778 · DOI
  26. Wang D, 2015, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  27. Burda Y, Grosse R, Salakhutdinov R. Importance weighted autoencoders; 2015. Preprint arXiv:1509.00519. · arXiv
  28. Bouchacourt D, 2018, AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  29. Maddison CJ, 2017, International Conference on Learning Representations
  30. Jang E, 2017, International Conference on Learning Representations
  31. van den Oord A, Li Y, Vinyals O. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding; 2018. Preprint arXiv:1807.03748. · arXiv
  32. Xiao H, Rasul K, Vollgraf R. Fashion-mnist: a novel image dataset for benchmarking machine learning algorithms. 2017. Preprint arXiv:1708.07747 · arXiv
  33. Ha D, Schmidhuber J. Recurrent world models facilitate policy evolution. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; 2018; Montreal, Canada.
  34. Hafner D, 2019, International Conference on Machine Learning
  35. Hafner D, 2019, International Conference on Learning Representations
  36. Suzuki M, Kaneko T, Matsuo Y. Pixyz: a library for developing deep generative models; 2021. Preprint arXiv: 2107.13109. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 109

Metadata

Authors
Suzuki, M., & Matsuo, Y.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Suzuki, Masahiro
Venue
Advanced Robotics
Published
2022-02-21
Volume
36
Issue
5-6
Pages
261-278
ISSN
  • 0169-1864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5535
OpenAlex
W4213299273
Cited by
109
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 4
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (JPNP16007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
multimodal learning, deep generative models, variational autoencoder, cross-modal generation, shared representations, multimodal generative models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review