The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Costs and benefits of constructing roots of small diameter
Abstract
Roots represent a considerable carbon cost for plants. Furthermore, plants vary considerably in how carbon is expended for belowground processes. One attribute that varies widely among species is the investment of root biomass in the production of root length. Relatively thin roots have a high specific root length (SRL) or length: dry weight ratio. Since water and nutrient uptake is based more upon root length than mass, one might conclude that species of high SRL invest their root biomass more efficiently than species of low SRL. This, however, ignores many other functional attributes of roots that may permit coarse lateral roots to be more adaptive than fine lateral roots under certain environmental conditions. In leaves, studies on the relationship of structure and function suggest that evergreen plants with greater leaf longevity commonly have thicker leaves, lower photosynthetic capacity, and lower respiration rates than deciduous plants. These kinds of relationships may also be true for thick roots (low SRL). Limited evidence suggests that species of high SRL tend to have greater plasticity in root growth, greater physiological capacity for water and nutrient uptake, but less root longevity and less mycorrhizal dependency than species of low SRL. More study is needed before the physiological traits associated with variation in length‐biomass ratio are understood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants
Brundrett, M. C. (2002) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00397.x · Cited by 1,524
Topsoil foraging – an architectural adaptation of plants to low phosphorus availability
Lynch, J. P., & Brown, K. M. (2001) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1013324727040 · Cited by 868
Eissenstat, D. M., & Yanai, R. D. (1997) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60005-7 · Cited by 818
Self-citationFreschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Field crops for phytoremediation of metal-contaminated land. A review
Vamerali, T., Bandiera, M., & Mosca, G. (2010) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-009-0268-0 · Cited by 592
Metadata
- Authors
- Eissenstat, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Plant Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6-7
- Pages
- 763-782
- ISSN
- 0190-4167 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4087
- OpenAlex
- W1983690371
- Cited by
- 683
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Costs and benefits of constructing roots of small diameter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01904169209364361
- The paper
- Eissenstat, D. M. (1992). Costs and benefits of constructing roots of small diameter. Journal of Plant Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169209364361
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.