The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Here, the coevolution of mycorrhizal fungi and roots is assessed in the light of evidence now available, from palaeobotanical and morphological studies and the analysis of DNA‐based phylogenies. The first bryophyte‐like land plants, in the early Devonian (400 million years ago), had endophytic associations resembling vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizas (VAM) even before roots evolved. Mycorrhizal evolution would have progressed from endophytic hyphae towards balanced associations where partners were interdependent due to the exchange of limiting energy and nutrient resources. Most mycorrhizas are mutualistic, but in some cases the trend for increasing plant control of fungi culminates in the exploitative mycorrhizas of achlorophyllous, mycoheterotrophic plants. Ectomycorrhizal, ericoid and orchid mycorrhizas, as well as nonmycorrhizal roots, evolved during the period of rapid angiosperm radiation in the Cretaceous. It is hypothesised that roots gradually evolved from rhizomes to provide more suitable habitats for mycorrhizal fungi and provide plants with complex branching and leaves with water and nutrients. Selection pressures have caused the morphological divergence of roots with different types of mycorrizas. Root cortex thickness and exodermis suberization are greatest in obllgately mycorrhizal plants, while nonmycorrhizal plants tend to have fine roots, with more roots hairs and relatively advanced chemical defences. Major coevolutionary trends and the relative success of plants with different root types are discussed.ContentsSummary275I.Introduction276II.Mycorrhizal Fungi276III.The Dawn of Mycorrhizas279IV.Mycorrhizal Associations of Living and Extinct Plants282V.Evolution of Roots288VI.The Root as a Habitat for Fungi290VII.Mycorrhizal Evolution Trends295Acknowledgements298References298
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, D. Y.-C., Kumar, S., & Hedges, S. B. (1999) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0617 · Cited by 493 · cited 1×
“Proterozoic 1500 Myr Suggested age of divergence of fungi from other life (Wang et al., 1999)”
BackgroundMiddle to Late Paleozoic Atmospheric CO 2 Levels from Soil Carbonate and Organic Matter
Mora, C. I., Driese, S. G., & Colarusso, L. A. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5252.1105 · Cited by 239
Cited by
Wasternack, C., & Hause, B. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mct067 · Cited by 2,629
Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants
Wang, B., & Qiu, Y.-L. (2006) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-005-0033-6 · Cited by 1,920
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review
Niu, Y. F., Chai, R. S., Jin, G. L., Wang, H., Tang, C. X., & Zhang, Y. S. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcs285 · Cited by 617
Flavonoids as Antioxidants and Developmental Regulators: Relative Significance in Plants and Humans
Brunetti, C., Di Ferdinando, M., Fini, A., Pollastri, S., & Tattini, M. (2013) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms14023540 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Brundrett, M. C.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04-30
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-304
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2142191074
- Cited by
- 1,524
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00397.x
- The paper
- Brundrett, M. C. (2002). Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00397.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.