Cited by 189Urban Agriculture and SustainabilityOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchUrban Green Space and Health

The Benefits of Gardening for Older Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Wang, Donna, MacMillan, Thalia·2013·Activities, Adaptation & Aging

Abstract

This article systematically reviews evidence for gardening as a beneficial activity for older adults. The authors reviewed 22 articles that assessed the benefits of gardening for both community-dwelling and institutionalized older adults. Through various research designs (quantitative and qualitative) and measurements utilized, the results reveal that gardening can be an activity that promotes overall health and quality of life, physical strength, fitness and flexibility, cognitive ability, and socialization. The implementation of various aspects of gardening as health-promoting activities transcend contexts of practice and disciplines and can be used in urban and rural communities as both individual and group activities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01924788.2013.784942

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous systematic reviews of gardening and health presented no quantitative synthesis.

    “However, since they presented no quantitative synthesis and only focused on health benefits of allotment gardening (Wang and MacMillan, 2013) and for elderly people (Genter et al., 2015), respectively, more comprehensive and convincing evidence is still wanting.”

    From Gardening is beneficial for health: A meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Wang and MacMillan, 2013

  • There have recently been two systematic reviews of studies exploring the association between gardening and health.

    “There have recently been two systematic reviews of studies exploring the association between gardening and health (Genter et al., 2015, Wang and MacMillan, 2013).”

    From Gardening is beneficial for health: A meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Wang and MacMillan, 2013

  • Previous systematic reviews of gardening and health focused only on allotment gardening or elderly people.

    “However, since they presented no quantitative synthesis and only focused on health benefits of allotment gardening (Wang and MacMillan, 2013) and for elderly people (Genter et al., 2015), respectively, more comprehensive and convincing evidence is still wanting.”

    From Gardening is beneficial for health: A meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Wang and MacMillan, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, D., & MacMillan, T.
Affiliations
  • Long Island University (US)
  • State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Donna
Venue
Activities, Adaptation & Aging
Published
2013-04
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
153-181
ISSN
  • 0192-4788 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-4368
OpenAlex
W2125771394
Cited by
189
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Activities Adaptation & Aging (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
Keywords
gardening, older adults, health promotion, quality of life, physical fitness, cognitive function, socialization, community-dwelling older adults, institutionalized elderly, group activities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review