Cited by 305Attachment and Relationship DynamicsCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Establishing criterion scores for the Kansas marital satisfaction scale and the revised dyadic adjustment scale

Crane, D. Russell, Middleton, Kenneth C., Bean, Roy A.·2000·The American Journal of Family Therapy

Abstract

This study demonstrates the usefulness of the KMSS and RDAS in distinguishing between the maritally distressed and nondistressed. For conceptual and statistical clarity, many marital interaction and marital therapy research measures, use a single cutoff score. It was determined that the cutoff score is 17 for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMSS) and 48 for the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) for husbands, wives, and couples. An equivalency table of mathematical formulas is also presented, allowing the conversion of individual and couple scores from one measure of marital quality to another. It is now possible to convert a score from any one of a number of instruments (KMSS, RDAS, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Marital Adjustment Test, Revised Marital Adjustment Test) to an equivalent score as measured by another instrument.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/019261800261815

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crane, D. R., Middleton, K. C., & Bean, R. A.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Family Therapy
Published
2000-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
53-60
ISSN
  • 0192-6187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0383
OpenAlex
W2130669963
Cited by
305
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale, marital satisfaction, marital distress, cut-off values, criterion validity, score conversion, marital adjustment, couples, Dyadic Adjustment Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review