Cited by 181Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsSocial Skills and Education

Trait Emotional Intelligence and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis

Malouff, John M., Schutte, Nicola S., Thorsteinsson, Einar B.·2014·The American Journal of Family Therapy

Abstract

This meta-analysis of six studies involving a total of 603 participants found a significant association (r = .32) between trait emotional intelligence and romantic relationship satisfaction. The association between the emotional intelligence of an individual and his or her self-reported romantic relationship satisfaction was significant, as was the relationship between an individual's emotional intelligence and the partner's level of satisfaction with the relationship. The association between trait emotional intelligence and romantic relationship satisfaction provides a foundation for future research, such as intervention studies aimed at increasing emotional intelligence in couples in order to increase romantic relationship satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01926187.2012.748549

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trait EI has positive relationships with marital satisfaction, relationship quality, and constructive communication between partners, and negative relationships with detrimental communication patterns like mutual avoidance and withholding.

    “Characteristic findings include positive relationships with marital satisfaction, relationship quality, and constructive communication between partners, and negative relationships with detrimental communication patterns, like mutual avoidance and withholding (for a meta-analysis on EI and marital satisfaction, see Malouff, Schutte, & Thorsteinsson, 2014).”

    From Developments in Trait Emotional Intelligence Research (2016) · cites this paper as Malouff, Schutte, & Thorsteinsson, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malouff, J. M., Schutte, N. S., & Thorsteinsson, E. B.
Affiliations
University of New England (AU)
Venue
The American Journal of Family Therapy
Published
2013-12-23
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
53-66
ISSN
  • 0192-6187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0383
OpenAlex
W2110089660
Cited by
181
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
Keywords
trait emotional intelligence, romantic relationship satisfaction, couples, partner satisfaction, relationship quality, emotional intelligence intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review