Cited by 20Groundwater flow and contamination studiesWater Quality and Resources StudiesFecal contamination and water quality

Using groundwater models to evaluate strategies for drinking-water protection in rural subdivisions

Wilcox, Jeffrey D., Gotkowitz, Madeline B., Bradbury, Kenneth R., Bahr, Jean M.·2010·Journal of the American Planning Association

Abstract

Problem: Groundwater contamination is a concern in rural residential subdivisions where numerous septic systems and private wells are sited in close proximity. Although most state codes regulate the construction and location of private wells, these regulations do not usually account for site-specific conditions that may impact drinking-water quality. Purpose: Groundwater models provide a technical basis for delineating groundwater flow to domestic wells. Despite their widespread use in the hydrologic sciences, planners and developers rarely have access to such models. We aimed to assess existing regulations for domestic wells and septic systems and illustrate how groundwater models can be used to evaluate strategies for additional drinking-water protection in unsewered residential subdivisions. Methods: We developed groundwater flow models for two subdivisions in southern Wisconsin, analyzed the results, and disseminated them to local officials, developers, and residents. Results and conclusions: Models of both subdivisions indicate that deeper individual wells or a single community well within a protected source area would improve the likelihood of obtaining high-quality drinking water. In response, several homeowners in one subdivision chose to pay for deeper wells and well casings or individual home water-treatment systems. The developer of the second site incorporated an unenforceable recommendation for deeper well casings into subdivision covenants, but none of the wells drilled so far have followed the recommendation. Implementing and enforcing well construction or setback criteria based on model results may require changing Wisconsin state codes to explicitly define what can and cannot be regulated at the local level. Takeaway for practice: Hydrogeologists can use standard groundwater modeling methods and information about local hydrologic conditions to inform planners as they develop guidelines to improve drinking-water quality. Partnerships between local hydrogeologists and planners are essential because differences in hydrogeologic setting, groundwater quality concerns, and regulatory structure will cause model results and proposed guidelines to vary on a case-by-case basis. Research support: Funding for this research was provided by the EPA Science to Achieve Results (STAR) graduate fellowship program, the University of Wisconsin Groundwater Resources Advisory Council (administered by the Wisconsin Water Resources Institute), and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01944361003742403

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of organic wastewater compounds in most of the wells tested suggests that current regulations specifying minimum distances between septic systems and domestic wells (in the US, typically 30 m) are not adequate to protect domestic wells from contamination by septic systems.

    “The presence of OWCs in most of the wells we tested suggests that current regulations specifying minimum distances between septic systems and domestic wells (in the US, typically 30 m; Wilcox et al., 2010) are not adequate to protect domestic wells from contamination by septic systems.”
  • Regulations provide minimum well-casing depths and minimum setback distances between wells and septic system tanks and leach fields (in the US, typically 15 m from septic tanks and 30 m from leach fields).

    “Regulations provide minimum well-casing depths and minimum setback distances between wells and septic system tanks and leach fields (in the US, typically 15 m from septic tanks and 30 m from leach fields; Wilcox et al., 2010).”
  • Detailed hydrogeological models that account for small-scale variations in hydraulic conductivity and flow direction can be used to model flow paths for water pumped from domestic wells, but these detailed models often are not available to planners and developers making decisions about siting domestic wells.

    “Detailed hydrogeological models that account for small-scale variations in hydraulic conductivity and flow direction can be used to model flow paths for water pumped from domestic wells, but these detailed models often are not available to planners and developers making decisions about siting domestic wells (Wilcox et al., 2010).”
  • It can be difficult to predict which wells are likely to contain OWCs from land use data alone due to uncertainties in determining domestic well capture zones.

    “Our finding that OWC presence was correlated with concentrations of NO 3 -and B is useful since it can be difficult to predict which wells are likely to contain OWCs from land use data alone due to uncertainties in determining domestic well capture zones.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilcox, J. D., Gotkowitz, M. B., Bradbury, K. R., & Bahr, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Asheville (US)
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Planning Association
Published
2010-06-21
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
295-304
ISSN
  • 0194-4363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0130
OpenAlex
W2063651608
Cited by
20
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Planning Association (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
Keywords
groundwater contamination, water source protection, septic systems, private wells, groundwater flow modeling, well casing, community wells, Wisconsin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review