Cited by 365Earthquake and Disaster Impact StudiesDisaster Management and ResilienceInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inequities in Long-Term Housing Recovery After Disasters

Peacock, Walter Gillis, Van Zandt, Shannon, Zhang, Yang, Highfield, Wesley E.·2014·Journal of the American Planning Association

Abstract

Problem, research strategy, and findings: Disaster impacts result from interactions between hazard exposure, physical vulnerability, and social vulnerability. We report empirical work from 1992′s Hurricane Andrew in Miami-Dade (FL) and 2008′s Hurricane Ike in Galveston (TX) to assess long-term trends in housing recovery. Longitudinal, parcel-level data on housing units along with neighborhood sociodemographic data permit analysis of the pace of recovery for different neighborhoods, populations, and housing types. Housing recovery is highly uneven for different population groups. Unsurprisingly, damage has major consequences; even after four years, the effects of damage are evident in the rebuilding process. Social vulnerability factors play differently in different settings. In Miami, income and race and ethnicity were critical determinants of higher losses and slower recovery rates, while in Galveston income was the more critical factor, with housing in lower-income areas suffering more damage and lagging significantly in the recovery process.Takeaway for practice: Effective land use policy and building codes can reduce physical vulnerability and ultimately damage, thus enhancing resilience for all. Differentials in impact and recovery trajectories suggest that assessment and the monitoring of recovery is critical to target resources to areas that are lagging. Perhaps most important is having an effective plan in place that addresses housing recovery issues to help reduce long-term consequences. Pre-event planning for housing and social change can help support community vision and overcome inequities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01944363.2014.980440

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 99 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Bates F. L., 1982, Recovery, change and development: A longitudinal study of the Guatemalan Earthquake (Final report, Guatemalan earthquake study)
  2. Bates F. L., 1962, The social and psychological consequences of a natural disaster: A longitudinal study of Hurricane Audrey (National Research Council Publication 1081)
  3. Bates F. L., 1987, The sociology of disasters, 291
  4. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7 · DOI
  5. Bolin R., 1982, Program on Environment and Behavior, Institute of Behavioral Science
  6. Bolin R., 1986, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 4, 35
  7. Bolin R., 1993, Socioeconomic Impacts (Monograph #5 prepared for the 1993 National Earthquake Conference, 107
  8. Bolin R., 1994, Household and community recovery after earthquakes
  9. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6 · DOI
  10. Dade County Planning Department, 1992, Hurricane Andrew: Impact area profile technical report
  11. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7 · DOI
  12. French S. P., 2008, Quantitative models of the social and economic consequences of earthquakes and other natural hazards (Final report. Mid-America Earthquake Center Project SE-2)
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511625862 · DOI
  14. Hamideh S., 2013, Housing recovery trajectories after Hurricane Ike
  15. 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4 · DOI
  16. McCarthy G., 2001, The economic benefits and costs of homeownership: A critical assessment of the research (Working Paper 01-02)
  17. Morrow, B. H. & Enarson, E.(1997). A gendered perceptive: The voices of women. In W. G. Peacock, B. H. Morrow, & H. Gladwin (Eds.), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters (pp. 116–140). London, UK: Routledge.
  18. National Research Council, 2006, Facing hazards and disasters: Understanding human dimensions
  19. Peacock W. G., 1997, Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters, 171
  20. Peacock W. G., 2008, Toward a resiliency and vulnerability observatory network: RAVON (Final Report, NSF Grant SES-08311115)
  21. Peacock W. G., 1997, Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disasters, 20
  22. Phillips B. D., 1993, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11, 99
  23. Phillips B., 1992, Living in the aftermath: Blaming processes in the Loma Prieta earthquake (No. 80)
  24. Quigley W. P., 2007, Wake Forest Law Review, 42, 393
  25. Rodriguez-Dod E. C., 2007, Nova Law Review, 31, 467
  26. Rohe W. M., 2001, The social benefits and costs of homeownership: A critical assessment of the research (Working Paper 00-01)
  27. Squires G. D., 1998, John Marshall Law Review, 31, 489
  28. Van Zandt S., 2012, Trajectories of recovery: How social vulnerability affects resilience to disaster

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peacock, W. G., Van Zandt, S., Zhang, Y., & Highfield, W. E.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • Texas A&M University at Galveston (US)
Corresponding author
  • Peacock, Walter Gillis
  • Zhang, Yang
  • Highfield, Wesley E.
Venue
Journal of the American Planning Association
Published
2014-10-02
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
356-371
ISSN
  • 0194-4363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0130
OpenAlex
W2034876258
Cited by
365
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
19.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Planning Association (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Keywords
housing recovery, disaster recovery, Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Ike, hurricane damage, social vulnerability, physical vulnerability, racial and ethnic disparities, income inequality, neighborhood recovery, housing loss, building regulations, land use policy, disaster resilience, Miami-Dade County, Galveston

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review