Making Historic Preservation Sustainable
Abstract
Problem, research strategy, and findings: Historic preservation has the potential to serve as a constructive agent of change within the built environment and to contribute to goals of environmental, economic, and social sustainability. However, tensions between sustainability goals and preservation policy and practice are impeding opportunities to forge common ground and a shared agenda. I review the existing literature related to the preservation–-sustainability nexus and critically analyze how preservation policies and practices conflict with or support key sustainability goals of energy consumption reduction, alternative energy production, urban densification, economic development, inclusion, diversity and participation, and intergenerational equity. Key findings of this research include the need to resolve tensions between sustainability and historic preservation practice through research and data, evolving preservation policies, and aligning historic preservation with the goals of environmental, economic, and social sustainability.Takeaway for practice: The future of the preservation field and its engagement with sustainability goals hinge on the ability to contribute to environmental, economic, and social aims, but to also demonstrate why social concerns may sometimes trump economic and environmental ones given the fundamentally social aims of historic preservation. Understanding where tensions lie and why conflicts arise is an important step toward enhancing research a…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Investment in historic districts may cause gentrification and displacement, though the effects are inconclusive due to limited studies.
“In addition, investment in historic districts may cause gentrification and displacement, though the effects are inconclusive due to limited studies (Avrami 2016).”
From Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings (2023) · cites this paper as Avrami 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teicher, H. M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-023-00836-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Avrami, E.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Avrami, Erica
- ORCID
- Avrami, Erica
- Venue
- Journal of the American Planning Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01-28
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 104-112
- ISSN
- 0194-4363 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0130
- OpenAlex
- W2296739194
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 22.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Planning Association (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Development and Cultural Heritage
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Sustainable Urban and Rural Development
- Keywords
- historic preservation, sustainability, preservation policy, energy consumption reduction, alternative energy production, urban densification, economic development, social inclusion, intergenerational equity, built environment change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review