Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Methods for Generating Land Suitability Maps: A Comparative Evaluation

Hopkins, Lewis D.·1977·Journal of the American Institute of Planners

Abstract

Land resource inventories to determine land suitabilities have become a standard part of planning analysis at many scales. Any attempt to review, compare, evaluate, or improve upon the myriad of case studies, many only partially documented and in limited circulation, suffers from the lack of reference to a common framework. This article develops a general statement of the purpose and character of land suitability analysis, a taxonomy of existing methods for identifying homogeneous areas and rating them as to suitability for specific uses, and a comparative evaluation of these methods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01944367708977903

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional connectivity analyses through graph trees provide the mathematical computational framework to explore the geometric theorems of land suitability offered by spatial analyses in a Generalised Additive Model (GAM).

    “Functional connectivity analyses through graph trees provide the mathematical computational framework to explore what are essentially the geometric theorems of land suitability that are offered up by the spatial analyses in a Generalised Additive Model (GAM) (Delangre, Radoux, & Dufrêne 2018; Hastie 2017; Hopkins 1977).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Alexander Christopher., 1964, Notes on the synthesis of form
  2. Alexander Christopher, 1962, The use of diagrams in highway route location: an experiment. Research report R62–3
  3. Barlowe Raleigh., 1972, Land resource economics
  4. 1971, Design of an environmental evaluation system
  5. Brandes Charles., 1973, Methods of synthesis for ecological planning
  6. Durfee R. C., 1972, The use of factor and cluster analysis in regional modeling. ORNL-TM-3720
  7. Fabos Julius, 1977, Composite landscape assessment
  8. Freeman, 1970, Public expenditures and policy analysis
  9. 10.1080/01944367408977481 · DOI
  10. Green P. E., 1970, Multidimensional scaling and related techniques in marketing analysis
  11. 10.1007/BF01962290 · DOI
  12. Hills, 1961, The ecological basis for land we planning
  13. 10.1016/0038-0121(73)90040-2 · DOI
  14. Hopkins, 1975, Optimum-seeking models for design of suburban land use plans
  15. Hopkins, 1973, Environmental impact statements: a handbook for writers and reviewers, 10.21236/ADA437872 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/01944367108977390 · DOI
  17. Juneja Narendra., 1974, Medford, performance requirements for the maintenance of social values represented by the natural environment of Medford Township, New Jersey
  18. 10.1016/0007-3628(65)90012-5 · DOI
  19. 1974, The interaction between urbanization and land: quality and quantity in environmental planning and design —progress report for years one, two, and three, proposal for year four
  20. Lewis, 1969, tree. Journal of the American Institute of Architects, 51, 59
  21. 10.1080/01944367408977498 · DOI
  22. MacDougall, 1974, A selected annotated bibliography on land resource inventory and analysis for planning
  23. McHarg, 1969, Design with nature
  24. Maranell, 1974, Scaling: a sourcebook for behavioral scientists
  25. Murray Timothy, 1971, Honey Hill: a systems analysis for planning the multiple use of controlled water areas, 2
  26. Patri Tito, 1970, The Santa Cruz Mountains regional pilot study: early warning system
  27. 1974, An approach to natural environmental analysis
  28. 10.1080/01944366508978151 · DOI
  29. Simon Herbert., 1969, The sciences of the artificial
  30. 1968, A land use plan design model; volume 1: model development; volume 2: model test; volume 3: final report
  31. Steinitz Carl, 1976, Landscape Architecture, 66, 444
  32. Storie T. E., 1933, An index for rating the agricultural value of solis. Bulletin 556
  33. Voelker A. H., 1976, Indices: a technique for using large spatial data bases. ORNL/RUS-15
  34. 1964, Technical report on the plan for the valleys, 2
  35. Ward, 1971, Proceedings of the Kentucky Workshop on Computer Applications to Environmental Design

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hopkins, L. D.
Venue
Journal of the American Institute of Planners
Published
1977-10
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
386-400
ISSN
0002-8991
Cited by
240
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review