The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environment and Policy Factors Shaping Global E-Commerce Diffusion: A Cross-Country Comparison
Open accessAbstract
This article examines the key global, environmental and policy factors that act as determinants of e-commerce diffusion. It is based on systematic comparison of case studies from 10 countries--Brazil, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Mexico, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, and the United States. It finds that B2B e-commerce seems to be driven by global forces, whereas B2C seems to be more of a local phenomenon. A preliminary explanation for this difference is that B2B is driven by global competition and MNCs that "push" e-commerce to their global suppliers, customers, and subsidiaries. This in turn creates pressures on local companies to adopt e-commerce to stay competitive. In contrast, B2C is "pulled" by consumer markets, which are mainly local and therefore divergent. While all consumers desire convenience and low prices, consumer preferences and values, national culture, and distribution systems differ markedly across countries and define differences in local consumer markets. These findings support the transformation perspective about globalization and its impacts. In terms of policy, the case studies suggest that enabling policies such as trade and telecommunications liberalization are likely to have the biggest impact on e-commerce, by making ICT and Internet access more affordable to firms and consumers, and increasing pressure on firms to adopt e-commerce to compete. Specific e-commerce legislation appears not to have as big an impact, although inadequate protection for both buyers and sellers in some countries suggests that mechanisms need to be developed to ensure greater confidence in doing business online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ZHU, K., KRAEMER, K. L., & DEDRICK, J. (2004) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2004.11045797 · Cited by 775
Self-citationZhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., Gurbaxani, V., & Xu, S. X. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148771 · Cited by 500
Self-citationGiddens’s Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research 1
Po-An Hsieh, J. J., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148831 · Cited by 423
Xu, S., Zhu, K., & Gibbs, J. (2004) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1080/1019678042000175261 · Cited by 253
Self-citationA Multivariate Study of Internet Use and the Digital Divide*
Serrano‐Cinca, C., Muñoz‐Soro, J. F., & Brusca, I. (2018) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12504 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbs, J., Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J.
- Venue
- The Information Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-18
- ISSN
- 0197-2243 (ISSN-L)
- 1087-6537
- OpenAlex
- W2007511821
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environment and Policy Factors Shaping Global E-Commerce Diffusion: A Cross-Country Comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01972240309472
- The paper
- Gibbs, J., Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. (2003). Environment and Policy Factors Shaping Global E-Commerce Diffusion: A Cross-Country Comparison. The Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309472
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.