Cited by 12Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeological and Geological StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Heat on Lithic Microwear Traces: An Experimental Assessment

Abstract

Despite decades of study of post-depositional surface modification by lithic use-wear analysts, the impact of heat remains underexplored. In this paper, we present the results of an experiment designed to test the effects of heat on chert tools with well-developed wood polish. We placed 50 flakes at varying positions in and around a wood fueled hearth. Visual examination of the wood polish before and after exposure to the fire identified no discernable alterations to its texture, brightness, or extent. These results indicate that the specific conditions of thermal alteration reported here may not inhibit lithic use-wear analysis on fine-grained chert implements with wood polish, ultimately highlighting the need for further experimentation on additional lithic materials and types of polish. Given that this experiment was inspired by analysis of stone tools from ephemeral hunter-gatherer camps, we consider the implications of this experiment for the analysis of chert tools at these sites.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01977261.2019.1690617

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Clemente-Conte I., 1997, Siliceous Rocks and Culture., 525
  2. Fullagar R., 2006, Archaeology in practice. A student guide to archaeology analyses, 207
  3. Hayden B., 1979, Lithic use-wear analysis
  4. Kononenko N., 2011, Online, 21, 1
  5. Patterson L. W., 1995, Lithic Technology, 20, 72

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rutkoski, A. R., Miller, G. L., Maguire, L., Eren, M. I., & Bebber, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Kent State University (US)
  • Illinois State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rutkoski, Ashley R.
  • Miller, G. Logan
Venue
Lithic Technology
Published
2019-11-14
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
38-47
ISSN
  • 0197-7261 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-6185
OpenAlex
W2989302023
Cited by
12
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lithic Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
lithic use-wear, chert flake, post-depositional alteration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review