Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: Key features in Latin America
Abstract
We introduce this special issue by explaining seven characteristics of land grabbing in Latin America. These features are not unique to the region. By highlighting them – arguing, for instance, that a key aspect in Latin America is intra-regional land grabbing driven by (trans)Latina companies – we hope to inspire new cross-regional comparisons to understand the dynamics of “global” land grabbing. Our focus on Latin America challenges some problematic generalisations in the literature, for instance, that land grabs occur mainly in fragile states. We interrogate the relationship between land grabbing and the “foreignisation” narrative, and the need to revisit the broader question of land concentration. Thus we build upon the literature locating land grabs and the land question within the political economy of global capitalism. Cette introduction au numéro spécial présente sept caractéristiques de l'accaparement des terres en Amérique latine, caractéristiques qui ne sont pas propres à la région. En les mettant en lumière, notamment en soutenant qu'en Amérique latine le phénomène, impulsé par des compagnies latino-américaine, est avant tout intra-régional, nous espérons susciter de nouvelles comparaisons inter-régionales afin de mieux comprendre les dynamiques mondiales de l'accaparement de terres. L'accent mis sur Amérique latine permet de remettre en question des généralisations auxquelles s'adonnent de nombreux écrits, comme par exemple que l'accaparement se produit principal…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cattle ranching is a vehicle for land grabbing.
“Nevertheless, ranching knowingly is also a vehicle for land grabbing (Borras et al., 2012;Lima Filho et al., 2021;Kröger, 2024)”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Borras et al., 2012
Cites
Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change
Bernstein, H. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781565494077 · Cited by 1,130 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Borras, S. M., Kay, C., Gómez, S., & Wilkinson, J.
- Affiliations
- International Institute of Social Studies (NL)
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
- Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Borras, Saturnino M.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 402-416
- ISSN
- 0225-5189 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-9100
- OpenAlex
- W2094713730
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 56.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- China Agricultural University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
- Keywords
- land grabbing, Latin America, multinational corporations, foreignization, land concentration, fragile states, land question
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review