Cited by 621Educational Technology in LearningOnline and Blended LearningWeb and Library Services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town

Open access
Bosch, Tanja E·2009·Communicatio

Abstract

Web-based learning has made learning content much more freely and instantaneously available to students who can download course notes and readings with a single mouse click. Facebook is one of many Web 2.0 tools – wikis, delicious, YouTube, podcasts – that are listed as having potential applications for teaching and learning. Moreover, it has been argued that the current generation of youth, often described as Net Geners or Digital Natives, may be resistant to traditional methods of teaching and learning. This article explores student use of Facebook at the University of Cape Town, as well as lecturer engagement with students via the new social media. Drawing on a virtual ethnography and qualitative interviews, this article shows that while there are potential positive benefits to using Facebook in teaching and learning, particularly for the development of educational micro-communities, certain challenges, including ICT literacy and uneven access, remain pertinent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02500160903250648

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Barnes K., 2007, Innovate, 3
  2. Bosch T., 2008, Commonwealth Journal of Youth Studies, 6, 52
  3. boyd d.m., 2008, Exposure, invasion, and social convergence, 14, 13
  4. Downes S., 2007, Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4
  5. Fragroso , S. 2006 . WTF a crazy Brazilian invasion . In F. Sudweeks & H. Hrachovec , Proceedings of CATaC 2006 , 255 – 274 . Murdoch, Australia : Murdoch University .
  6. Glenn J., 2000, Business Education Forum, 54, 6
  7. Hay L., 2000, The Social Administrator, 57, 6
  8. Kift S., 2007, Proceedings ePortfolio Australia – Imagining New Literacies
  9. Koerwer S., 2007, Computers in Libraries, 40
  10. Markham A., 2006, The Sage book of qualitative research
  11. Miller S., 2007, Computers in Libraries, 18
  12. Rheingold H., 1993, The virtual community: Finding connection in a computerised world
  13. Sharf B., 1999, Doing internet research, 243

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 621

Metadata

Authors
Bosch, T. E.
Affiliations
University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Bosch, Tanja E
Venue
Communicatio
Published
2009-11
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
185-200
ISSN
  • 0250-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-5379
OpenAlex
W2166900011
Cited by
621
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 103 · 2014: 90 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 29
FWCI
40.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communicatio (publishedVersion)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
Keywords
Facebook, social networking in education, Web 2.0, online learning, digital natives, ICT literacy, internet access inequality, University of Cape Town

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review