IoT patent roadmap for smart logistic service provision in the context of Industry 4.0
Abstract
Industry 4.0 enables the management of factories manufacturing products with complexity and flexibility. The corresponding logistic services must provide greater accuracy and efficiency in logistic operations. The Internet of Things (IoT) is an important aspect for smart logistics in the context of Industry 4.0. For instance, intelligent logistics models use IoT integrated technologies, e.g. radio frequency identification (RFID), wireless sensor network (WSN) and cloud computing, to enhance the traceability and decision supports of logistic processes in real-time speed, high accuracy, and flexibility. This research focuses on analyzing the related technology roadmaps for the adoption of IoT technologies in smart logistic services. A case research is conducted specifically to identify the relationship between IoT-oriented technologies and deployed advanced logistic services. The logistic operations are organized into an ontology schema based on a four level service framework. The research proposes a roadmap approach to visualize the patent allocations and evolutions corresponding to logistic services at each level. Although the patent roadmap methodology is generic, this research focuses on the two industry leaders, which are UPS and IBM. Using the roadmap methodology, the IoT enabled smart logistic patents are analyzed to identify technology-related business strengths and strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The integration of IoT and CPS technologies into manufacturing systems has brought about enhanced capabilities, allowing the management of intricate and adaptable systems to effectively handle sudden changes in production quantity and customization needs.
“The integration of IoT and CPS technologies into manufacturing systems has brought about enhanced capabilities, allowing the management of intricate and adaptable systems to effectively handle sudden changes in production quantity and customization needs [74].”
From Digital Twins in the IIoT: Current Practices and Future Directions Toward Industry 5.0 (2025) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., Fan, C.-Y., Hsu, A. P. T., Li, X.-K., & Lee, I. J. Y.
- Affiliations
- National Tsing Hua University (TW)
- Department of Management Science, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
- National Institutes of Applied Research (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Trappey, Amy J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-09-19
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 593-602
- ISSN
- 0253-3839 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-7299
- OpenAlex
- W2755040801
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 18.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 104-2218-E-007 -015 -MY2)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Transport and Logistics Innovations
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Keywords
- Internet of Things, smart logistics, Industry 4.0, technology roadmap, RFID, wireless sensor networks, cloud computing, logistics traceability, UPS, IBM, business strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review